Skip to main content

Robert Moses, transportation, and the question of Atlantic Yards

So, what’s Robert Moses’s legacy regarding transportation in New York City? Worse than recently acknowledged, it seems.

Attendees at a forum last Wednesday at the Museum of the City of New York were provided with a pamphlet printed by former Theodore Kheel, president of Nurture New York’s Nature, who passionately believes that the current Moses revisionism disregards his disdain for public transportation.

The pamphlet, titled "The Road Not Taken," points out that the Robert Moses and the Modern City exhibits, as well as the accompanying book, downplays how Moses ignored investment in public transit. The pamphlet consists mainly of long quotes from Robert Caro’s scathing biography The Power Broker.

Kheel, a renowned labor mediator, on April 1 published an op-ed in the Times’s Sunday regional weekly sessions recounting how he once proposed "that tolls for the city's bridges and tunnels be doubled, and the proceeds used to subsidize mass transit." Today, he wrote similarly, funds from congestion pricing could be used to make subway ridership free.

Schwartz on Moses

Among the panelists, traffic engineer Sam Schwartz, aka “Gridlock Sam,” argued that Moses gets a little too much blame and credit.

New York actually has fewer highways coursing through it than other major American cities, Schwartz pointed out. The reason? Moses built highways in New York before other cities did, so when it came time to propose such highways through the center of Manhattan, the populace was already organized.

New York actually built much more transportation infrastructure—subways, bridges—before Moses's time, Schwartz pointed out. Schwartz suggested that Mayor John Lindsay and Gov. Nelson Rockefeller made a “big mistake” in letting Moses go, because he was “a fantastic manager—the amount of highways he built was pretty much the right amount.”

Today, Schwartz said, we “don’t need a Moses,” but we should be correcting some of his mistakes. For example, he said, every bridge in the city should have passageways for bicyclists and pedestrians. The Verrazzano Narrows Bridge should include light rail or bus rapid transit. Limited access highways like the Belt Parkway should be reconstructed to allow trucks that otherwise traverse neighborhood streets.

And, Schwartz said, we should take away tolls from bridges between the boroughs and “adopt congestion pricing where it belongs, in the central business district.”

Russianoff reacts

Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign observed that much of what he’s done in the past quarter-century has been “a reaction to the Moses era.” Moses, he said, prioritized autos over transit, working with a like-minded bureaucracy and catering to special interests, including the construction trades.

Russianoff and other activists helped block Westway, which he said some portray as “an example of getting nothing done.” By contrast, Russianoff said, he sees it as “the Davids fighting Goliath,” and transferring $1 billion in federal funds to the transit system in the end.

In recent years, he said, there have been some signs of progress, citing the magnificent new subway station in Coney Island and the restoration of the Franklin Avenue subway.

View from the MTA

Lee Sander, CEO of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, offered some valuable context. In Moses’ time, there was strong support for urban centers, with a powerful contingent in Congress and in Albany boosting New York City. None of those obtain today. Moses had limited legal and institutional constraints, as well as enormous amounts of federal funds.

Today, there’s much less funding and more institutional fragmentation. However, Sander said the MTA is moving ahead on ambitious projects, including the Second Avenue Subway, East Side access for the Long Island Railroad, the extension of the #7 subway line, and more. Beyond that, non-MTA projects like Moynihan Station and the Santiago Calatrava PATH terminal are in motion.

His point: Moses’ accomplishments were assisted by favorable political, institutional, and financial dynamics. Today, the barriers are great, he said, offering a baseball metaphor, but “we’re on first base.”

Moses & Jacobs

Members of the audience expressed much skepticism about the MTA’s record, noting, for example, the incapacity to provide audible announcements or to identify when buses will arrive. Sander said the MTA first wanted to deal with infrastructure.

Russianoff acknowledged reasons for cynicism, citing the MTA’s cost overruns and former Sen. Al D’Amato’s infamous collection of a $500,000 fee to lobby the MTA in just one phone call.

Time ran out before audience members could ask all the questions they wanted, but the final questioner asked about the influence of Moses’ philosophical antagonist, Jane Jacobs.

The influence of Jacobs, declared moderator Robert Yaro of the Regional Plan Association, is “lying beneath all of this.” He noted that no one is proposing new highways.

Sander pointed out that the MTA is learning from New Jersey, trying to practice “smart growth” and transit-oriented development. Schwartz said that today there’s “greater sensitivity to neighborhoods.”

What about AY?

But what would Robert Moses think of the Atlantic Yards plan? Nobody got to ask that question., but it would've been interesting to hear the answer.

After all, Schwartz was hired by developer Forest City Ratner to develop the Atlantic Yards transportation plan, though his web site curiously does not mention Atlantic Yards in the list of projects.

Russianoff’s group has joined the lawsuit against the environmental impact statement, an implicit attack on Schwartz's transportation plan, and he has warned that the project’s density “would bring more havoc to drivers and transit riders.”

Yaro's RPA, for example, has offered conditional support for Atlantic Yards while warning that comprehensive changes, including congestion pricing, were necessary to make the transportation plan work.

Moses, architectural historian Francis Morrone has said, would’ve been appalled at the lack of a coordinated traffic plan. On the other hand, said participants at a symposium last month said Moses, as a product of his time, might today support subsidies for a sports facility.

That still doesn't mean that Moses, who warned of a "China Wall of traffic" should a baseball stadium be built near Atlantic and Flatbush avenues, would've supported this project. But it would have been interesting to hear Schwartz tackle the question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.