Skip to main content

Atlantic Yards position AWOL on Yassky's campaign web site

City Council Member David Yassky, the fundraising frontrunner for for the Congressional seat being vacated by retiring Rep. Major Owens, has a spiffy campaign web site that describes his accomplishments and positions.

What the site lacks is an obvious position on the Atlantic Yards project. Atlantic Yards is a controversial issue for the diverse district, which includes a minority of (mostly-white) brownstoners (allegedly) concerned about the project's scale and a majority of (mostly black) working-class residents (allegedly) more concerned about the promises of construction jobs and affordable housing.

The lack of clarity reflects how Yassky has treaded carefully, expressing both enthusiasm for and concern about the project. (Supporters see that as nuanced, while critics see it as expedient; others say Bruce Ratner's not pleased either.) The twist is that Chris Owens, son of the incumbent and one of the four black candidates in the race, is the only one to take an unequivocal position opposing the project.

Even though it's more of a local than Congressional issue, this is one of the few issues on which the mostly-liberal candidates differ; the candidates are arguing competence, clout, and racial politics. (I couldn't find a position on the web sites of candidates Yvette Clarke, Carl Andrews, or Nick Perry, though Clarke and Andrews have been reported as favoring the project.)

Going to the web

Yassky's campaign web site contains a drop down box titled "Yassky on the issues," with 13 topics including Brooklyn Bridge Park and Affordable Housing. There's no box for the Atlantic Yards project, though it is as significant and controversial as the park. The Affordable Housing section mentions inclusionary zoning in Greenpoint and Williamsburg, but not the controversial agreement for the Atlantic Yards project negotiated by developer Forest City Ratner and the community group ACORN.

Actually, if you search, you can find a Yassky position. In the News & Press section there's a 9/13/05 press release headlined "Yassky and Brennan to MTA: Reject Proposal, Decrease Scope of Development at Atlantic Yards."

Other statements

Other statements aren't on Yassky's web site. Since then, at the 10/18/05 public hearing on the Draft Scope of Analysis, Yassky said, “I’m for the project, I want to see it done right,” but followed up to emphasize that he won't support the plan unless changes are made.

More recently, he told a Park Slope audience in March that “unless there’s a serious and concrete plan” regarding traffic, “I think the project has to be resisted on that ground alone.”

Is Yassky hedging when he speaks to other audiences? (I'm told that at the Independent Neighborhood Democrats debate last Thursday, both Yassky and Clarke criticized eminent domain for a favored developer and said they were troubled by its use for the Atlantic Yards project, but neither went beyond that to say the project "has to be resisted.")

Why can't he state his position on his web site?

I emailed him to ask about the omission, and he responded, "We are in the process of updating and relaunching our web site." For questions about the project, he suggested I contact press spokesman Evan Thies.

That's not quite the point. If he's going to offer positions on 13 issues, he shouldn't ignore Atlantic Yards. But I did contact Thies, who responded, "The web site has had statements from David on Atlantic Yards posted in the past, including his public testimony on the project. The site is in the midst of an upgrade and will relaunch sometime next month. I'm sure there will be Atlantic Yards items and comments." He didn't affirm that it would be in the section on issues, though.

Past hedging

Yassky does have a record of mixing enthusiasm and concern. At the 5/26/05 City Council hearing, according to a 6/2/05 Brooklyn Downtown Star article headlined Hearing Turns Into Back-'Yards' Brawl, ACORN's Bertha Lewis declared, "It's time for some affirmative support...I want the councilmembers to roll up their sleeves and help us on this," and Yassky responded by taking off his jacket and began rolling up his sleeves.

Later, however Yassky expressed concerns about traffic, project scale, and the project's impact on city and social services. "I don't think it's adequate to leave it to the ESDC and wait and see," he told FCR VP Jim Stuckey. "There are concrete things that we can do ahead of time."

Stuckey responded that the responses would be in the project's environmental impact statement (EIS). "It doesn't make sense to speculate right now," Stuckey insisted.

But Yassky's instinct to address problems sooner rather than later seems sound. The Draft EIS won't arrive until late May or early June, and Forest City Ratner president Bruce Ratner expects government approval (meaning Final EIS, plus other signoffs) by mid-fall. That's not a lot of time.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…