Skip to main content

Yo, Bloomberg: It's time to solve the Brooklyn transit problem

Brooklyn may be booming, but what good is it if the streets in the borough’s core are clogged, pedestrians are stymied, and the landscape unwelcoming? And why are we so far behind European cities, and even New Jersey? It's time, said participants at a forum last night on “Traffic and Transportation in Brownstone Brooklyn,” to pressure public officials and city agencies to think more broadly.

"Today we look at traffic like it’s the weather—a force of nature,” observed Aaron Naparstek, the moderator and organizer of the forum. “But that’s not so. It’s a human-made problem.” Several creative examples from other cities were cited during the evening: London minimizes car traffic with congestion pricing. Paris turns an expressway into a waterfront urban beach. Copenhagen prizes bicycles. Bogota, Colombia builds lanes for bus rapid transit (BRT). Even downtrodden Detroit has built a park around a downtown crossroads. A current exhibit at the Municipal Art Society emphasizes Livable Streets.

The Atlantic Yards angle

The forum, sponsored by the Park Slope Civic Council drew more than 200 people on a chilly night to the Old First Reformed Church. The topic was far broader than the Atlantic Yards project, though both developer Forest City Ratner and the city Department of Transportation (DOT) declined to participate, saying that “the discussion was maybe premature,” PSCC President Lydia Denworth told the crowd. (Later, she told me that both entities had said they were waiting for the Empire State Development Corporation to release a Draft Environmental Impact Statement regarding the project.)

City Council Member David Yassky, who at the ESDC scoping hearing in October testified cautiously about Atlantic Yards, got to speak before the panel began and declared, “This is far from premature. This is exactly what we need to be doing right now. I think the traffic and parking issues… are a first-order obstacle.” Even if the scale of the project can be reduced and the community benefits can be locked in, he said, “unless there’s a serious and concrete plan” regarding traffic, “I think the project has to be resisted on that ground alone.”

The DEIS will address some of the issues, Yassky said, “but I don’t want to count on it…. We have to demand from the city some fairly big responses.” Also present were several other public officials or their representatives, and representatives from borough and city agencies.

Public spaces, not auto spaces

Flatbush Avenue and Downtown Brooklyn came in for much criticism—even as the nearby brownstone neighborhoods remain lures. “This is one of the greatest challenges I’ve seen in a major city, trying to restore a core area that’s been dominated by traffic,” declared Fred Kent, president of the Project for Public Spaces (PPS). “I can’t think of any intersection in the core of Brooklyn that’s comfortable to walk through.”

Still, he offered a sign of progress. “There are no great public spaces in Downtown Brooklyn,” he said, but a director of an unnamed Brooklyn Local Development Corporation had invited PPS in for a meeting to begin to address that.

Like other panelists, Kent suggested that other states—not merely European cities—were far ahead of New York. “We’ve trained 600 traffic engineers in New Jersey,” he said. “No project in New Jersey can be scoped out without placemaking.” He said that traffic engineers in New York typically take a “project approach,” which looks at issues narrowly. A “place-driven approach,” by contrast, invites community input and a broader perspective.

Blame Bloomberg

"The DOT is not into this idea,” Kent said. “They can be brought in, with enough pressure.” Jon Orcutt, Executive Director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign criticized the city’s transportation policy as “muddle through, hope nothing really bad happens, and give developers what they want.”

Orcutt pointed out that the Downtown Brooklyn Traffic Calming Study was still on the shelf, and that the rezoning of Downtown Brooklyn and the Greenpoint-Williamsburg waterfront “took place with virtually no thought of transportation.” Only subsequent pressure from influential entities in Downtown Brooklyn led to a follow-up traffic study.

“We just came through a political campaign where traffic and transportation did not register one blip on the screen,” Orcutt said, contrasting New York with the political maturity of London, where candidates competed to promise they’d get cars of the street. One of the problems, Orcutt said, is that authority is spread across a multitude of city and state agencies

But the solution, he said, “is appreciating how bare-knuckled New York City politics and blame the mayor.” It can work. Activists from car-choked Staten Island got Mayor Bloomberg to put traffic there near the top of his agenda, and in his State of the City address delivered at SI’s Snug Harbor on January 26, the mayor announced that he had given city agencies 60 days to produce new traffic initiatives for a growth management task force.

Development impacts

Some kind of Brooklyn transportation coalition will have to create an agenda for Brooklyn, he said, and indeed, the meeting last night was just a start; panelists will be making presentations before other civic groups. One of the first thing such a coalition must do, Orcutt said, is to “get a real picture of the impacts of development.” He said the city pattern, for the West Side Stadium and other such projects, is to “give the developer what they want” and then adjust the impacts on the EIS.

And Orcutt had some cautiously optimistic words regarding Atlantic Yards. “I have a bit of a better feeling from the Ratner EIS, which is not a city project.” Why, he was asked later. Because the developer seems to have a greater grasp on some of the challenges: “From talking to them, they understand the issue of transit access to the site.” Yes, but the numbers deserve some more explanation.

Earlier, Kent took a swipe at Frank Gehry, architect for the Atlantic Yards plan, quoting Gehry as having said, “I don’t do context.” Gehry’s creations “may be placeholder icons,” Kent said, but “they’re placeless buildings.”

Practical steps, bold steps

Karla Quintero, project coordinator of Transportation Alternatives, provided a preview of a new study, titled “Traffic’s Human Toll: How Cars and Trucks Affect New Yorkers’ Quality of Life.” The results not unsurprisingly show that people living on lightly-trafficked streets find their environments more pleasant than those living on heavily-trafficked streets.

A Brooklyn transportation coalition would have a lot to talk about. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Naparstek pointed out, is studying the possibility of Bus Rapid Transit on Flatbush Avenue: “This is the kind of thing we can get behind.”

A residential parking program is also a possibility, especially since the Atlantic Yards project could generate intense demands for parking spaces.. Orcutt said citizens must pressure their elected officials, “but you don’t want a study… You need to say: ‘we want a test.’”

One questioner lamented that Grand Army Plaza is inaccessible to pedestrians because of high-speed traffic. "It would be a great question for DOT," Naparstek observed, but Kent had a more audacious suggestion: close streets around it as a test, and see what happens. After all, Paris creates a beach every summer.

Where do the cars actually go, when a city closes streets? "The traffic disappears," Kent responded. "They realize they can get there other ways." Orcutt followed up, saying, "The infrastructure tells you what to do." Easier said than done in Brooklyn, but expect the conversations to continue.

Comments

  1. Hi! I just found your blog. I haven't had time to read through it but I'm bookmarking. I've compiled a lot of info about Charlie Gargano (none of it favorable)over the past few years.

    What I wanted to mention here is my suspicion that his son, Lawrence, was the contractor on at least one of Forest City's (FCR's parent) Sterling Glen Communities assisted living projects. Forest City built a Sterling Glen home in Bayshore on Long Island and that's the one I have in mind. If I'm right, then there may be others.

    Wish I could be of more help. Some of my comments about Gargano and his links to Eagle Building Technologies can be found over at the TPM Cafe.

    http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/27519

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.