Skip to main content

Process vs. projects, the 'race card,' and 'reluctant preservationists'

At a conference Saturday, Roberta Brandes Gratz, an urbanist and author of The Living City, wasn't directly addressing the Atlantic Yards project. But there was an echo of sorts when she said the term “economic development” was wrongly used today to refer to big real estate projects. “Economic development is a process," she declared, "that builds on the inherent strengths and talents of a workforce.”

Speaking on a panel at the Historic Districts Council conference on "Place, Race, Money & Art: The Economics and Demographics of Historic Preservation," Gratz advised, “The public schools should be on your radar screen as part of your preservation values,” contrasting it with project-driven development such as a stadium, aquarium, or mall. “If you invest in public schools and mass transit, the city will take care of itself.”

(That does beg the question of housing, and the Atlantic Yards project, it should be noted, is part of an emerging trend, a mix of a sports facility plus other development, in this case housing. The latter would supply far greater economic return than the arena--though the projections also can be questioned.)

Gratz described herself: “I am a preservationist. More importantly, I’m an urbanist. It’s about economic development, transportation, public spaces, public health… looking at a place holistically.” She observed, “There are a lot of developers makings tons of money on the buildings you guys saved.”

Planning decisions can have far-reaching effects. When there was a plan to build a Lower Manhattan Expressway, Gratz said, “SoHo was considered an anachronism.” Because it was designated for demolition, “that killed manufacturing.” She called that “a classic example of ‘planners blight.’”

Zoning and its discontents

Gratz and Carol Clark of the city’s Department of Housing Preservation & Development (HPD) got into a dispute about zoning and its effect on development. Clark cited “contextual zoning,” in which the city regulates development in buildings adjacent to historic districts.

Gratz offered some criticism: “We have contextual zoning, the Planning Commission is zoning, in neighborhoods like Greenpoint and Williamsburg, 44-story towers. There’s a lot of contradictions."

Clark pointed out that the waterfront rezoning included incentives for “a significant amount of affordable housing” affordable to a family of four earning up to $50,000 per year. “These are competing policy goals.” (Note that the Atlantic Yards plan would involve a broader range of incomes and that, unlike the waterfront plan, it was not part of a City Council-negotiated rezoning process.)

Clark offered some more perspective. The city became the owner of more than 100,000 units of housing in buildings abandoned for nonpayment of taxes. Nearly all have been rehabilitated for affordable housing. “Going forward, there is a preponderance of new construction," she said. "Hence the rezoning in Williamsburg/Greenpoint.”

Property values and development

Has historic preservation helped property values? The answer is complex, Clark said, but there’s some evidence that it has helped those with residential properties. (There’s much less data on commercial properties.) She noted that the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) , the voice of the real estate industry, has often countered preservationists, because landmarking (of both buildings and neighborhoods) limits the development potential of land. Still, some owners of individually landmarked skyscrapers, who were not about to replace their buildings, have said the designation adds prestige.

Does preservation deter economic development? REBNY fought the designation of TriBeCa as a historic district. Now there’s been a tremendous amount of economic activity, both the renovation of existing buildings and new construction on vacant lots.

Does historic preservation lead to gentrification and displacement? The evidence is mixed, Clark said. As the city’s population has grown—New York has added 840,000 residents since 1990--there is increased demand in an already expensive and tight market. (That’s the equivalent of a city like Denver.) Since 1987, Clark said, the city has spent $6.3 billion to supply over 250,000 units of affordable housing. Now the city wants to provide housing for a half-million New Yorkers by 2013.

Clark acknowledged that some residents are under pressure from rising rents, especially those not protected by rent regulations, but cited a report on gentrification and displacement from Citizens Housing and Planning Council that suggested that people are willing to pay more to stay in neighborhoods where the quality of life is good. (I couldn’t find the report, but similar findings are discussed here.)

Lessons from Red Hook?

Gratz described developer Greg O’Connell, who has bought up many dormant industrial buildings in Red Hook, as “my greatest urban hero. He is about economic development and preservation… There’s a value he adheres to that a lot of developers and property owners don’t."

The neighborhood, O’Connell said, was desolate when he went there in the early 1980s, “but I saw these beautiful historic buildings on the waterfront,” neglected because of the city’s fiscal crisis. One building, the 1854 Clay Retort and Fire Brick Works on Van Dyke Street, was even slated for demolition, with a permit issued for demolition. O’Connell bought the building and restored it. (Photo from Forgotten NY.)

(Hmm. Does that some of the buildings in the Atlantic Yards footprint slated for demolition, like 461-463 Dean Street--scroll down on this post--could be saved? An engineer suggested it seemed likely, at least from his limited outside view.)

O’Connell has emphasized space for businesses rather than more lucrative residential use. “Sometimes we ought to think about the highest and best use not always being the bottom line,” he said. “I could make triple the amount, if I did residential. But you have to keep the balance."

His buildings now house over 100 businesses, with more than 1200 employees—plus 200 more at the emerging Fairway store. He has worked outside the city’s historic preservation framework. Gratz called it “genuine economic development made possible by historic preservation. But the city does not learn from his example.”

Race and preservation

At a later panel, Michael Henry Adams, a preservationist and author from Harlem, observed that it was “poignant” that many preservation efforts in minority neighborhoods have been ignored. He observed that it has been difficult to get many historic buildings in Harlem landmarked, but, as whites continue to move into the neighborhood, they eventually will demand such landmarking, and be successful.

“Some say that African-Americans have never shown any great interest in preserving the environment,” Adams said. “It chagrined me to hear [then-Mayor David] Dinkins call landmarking an impediment to development in Harlem.” Dinkins resisted calls to landmark the Audubon Ballroom, where Malcolm X was killed.) However, Adams said of Community Board 10 in Harlem, “Over and over, they’ve done the right thing.” In fact, the resistance to Robert Moses in Greenwich Village was paralleled by a similar, though far more obscure, effort in Harlem.

Former City Council Member Bill Perkins, who represented Central Harlem, was on the panel, and Adams observed that he was disappointed how little support preservationists offered to Perkins’ efforts to reform the Landmarks Preservation Commission—apparently because they were afraid to antagonize the commission. It would allowed the City Council, by majority vote, to require the LPC to hold hearings on eligible properties. Currently the LPC has sole discretion to hold such hearings.

Perkins read an excerpt from an article which described African-Americans’ suspicion of historic preservation efforts in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, DC, where black residents were squeezed out when preservationists and developers boosted the value of the land. He looked toward the mostly-white audience: “I look out and realize: There is a problem.” He added, “Folks are not anti-preservation. They just think it’s a hidden agenda sometimes for displacement or gentrification.”

Why the “race card” gets played

Tom Angotti, a Hunter College professor of urban planning, observed that the late Joan Maynard, founding executive director of the Weeksville Society in Brooklyn, taught him that preservation involved not just buildings, but also spiritual, emotional, cultural, and political elements. Angotti congratulated HDC “for putting race on the agenda.” He observed that race has become an important factor in development, and that “the race card” was being used when it comes to developer-driven development.

Without specifically mentioning the Atlantic Yards project—about which Angotti has commented forcefully--he outlined the situation: a developer finds people “who have been systematically ignored in the past, so they respond quite positively when someone with money and power says ‘let’s make a deal’”—just as white groups have done in the past. Preservationists and environmentalists may protest, but, Angotti said in admonishment, “Did you talk about joining together? The problem is: There’s no dialogue across racial lines until someone comes in and takes over the conversation.”

He blamed government for the situation. Regarding the City Planning Department, he said, "The name ‘Planning’ should be taken out of their name. They should be the Zoning Department.” He noted that 70 community-based plans had been created around the city, but only seven have been approved. As for HPD, “change that name to the ‘Department of Development.’ They’ve been imitating the real estate market; they go out and assemble land for development.”

Artists and developers

A panel on the role of artists in reviving neighborhoods offered an intriguing example of the interplay between a developer and the community. Artist Doreen Gallo, a longtime DUMBO resident, observed, “It was really developers who organized the artists.” David Walentas, the principal developer of DUMBO, gave three not-for-profit gallery spaces free rent, and artists found a place to display their works.

But when activists in the neighborhood asked their friends and neighbors to sign petitions protesting Walentas’s plans for the waterfront, Gallo recounted, "No one would sign the petitions. They were represented by galleries that got free rent.”

Nicholas Evans-Cato, who lives in Vinegar Hill, observed that “Artists are not generally interested in preservation or their neighborhoods.” When he has canvassed neighbors to join his efforts, he said, “Mostly what I heard was: ‘I’m really busy now—great you’re doing that.’”

He noted that a small number of prominent artists—such as Joel Sternfeld, photographer of the High Line in Manhattan—had become preservationists. The challenge in getting artists to think beyond their own art and survival, he said, raised some resonant questions. “What do we expect of citizens? What do we expect of government?” he asked. “Aren’t many of us reluctant preservationists, doing what we want government to do?”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.