Skip to main content

In Brooklyn, hyperlocal news gets a boost with Patch (but we need much more)

The nature of the local new media is changing and, for Brooklyn, there may be some promise in Patch, the AOL-funded enterprise that's hiring do-it-all editors (without offices) in communities around the country--800 so far, with a goal of 1000.

The editors are assisted by freelancers and other contributors and, in Brooklyn at least, form a bit of a network. Right now there's a Prospect Heights Patch, Park Slope Patch, Fort Greene/Clinton Hill Patch, Carroll Gardens/Cobble Hill Patch, and Bed-Stuy Patch.

What, no Brooklyn Heights or Williamsburg? Maybe those communities were seen as already "taken" by the Brooklyn Heights Blog and culture blogs like Free Williamsburg. (Disclosure: I've done one freelance piece for Patch.)

Not just news

Patch, self-described as "your local source for news, events, business listings, and discussion," got some semi-skeptical treatment in a New York Times article January 17--an article that ignored Patch in New York but pointed out that the company is focusing on relatively affluent suburban towns that can generate advertising.

Indeed, Patch strikes me as optimized for small communities that don't have a newspaper to cover key local institutions like the school board and mayor's office. (See, for example, the comment by Ann O. at the bottom of this CJR post.)

Brooklyn lacks such cohesion--even the community boards stretch beyond a single community--so the match is inexact.

And Patch is still feeling its way. I'm not sure what an article on "Rent is Too Damn High" candidate Jimmy McMillan shilling for a New Jersey car dealership was doing on the Fort Greene/Clinton Hill Patch. Then again, Patch did a nice job covering the memorial for former District Leader Bill Saunders--and no other news outlet bothered.

The business plan

Patch is a business plan as much as a journalism effort, so marketing to local businesses and compiling listings does have a geographic component. And while Brooklyn has a lot of blogs, most are not serious businesses.

Consultant Mel Taylor has been following the competition between Patch and local weeklies. He observed:
Intellectual theorizing and to-do list creation from the incumbents only provides Patch more time to marshal small armies of sellers to get in front of every mom and pop business in sight.
Taylor added:
Patch is now building local advertiser directories, using good old fashioned face-to-face client calls. They build a relationship with small business in order to sell them something at a later date. Patch is serious about the revenue piece of hyper-local’s puzzle. They’re well aware that without revenue and profit, there’s no serious chance of consistent and self-sustaining, local news coverage.
After all, the New York Times's Fort Greene-Clinton Hill blog, The Local, while doing some worthy work, lost its Times staffer and has become mainly an outpost of the CUNY Journalism School, which means the staff waxes and wanes.

Competition with the weeklies

The local Patch sites are competing not with the dailies or blogs but mainly with the Murdoch-owned weekly Brooklyn Paper (updated daily online) and Courier-Life chains.

And the Bed-Stuy Patch offers some competition to the established Our Time Press, which has a significant institutional history in the neighborhood but a web site that, though improved, still needs work.

The new Patch sites lack the institutional memory, editorial page, and archive that the newspapers can offer.

(That's mainly to their detriment, but not necessarily. Patch is starting from scratch on Atlantic Yards, rather than swerving somewhat, like the Brooklyn Paper. In 2008, the Brooklyn Paper thought it was big news that Forest City Ratner lied about Frank Gehry being born in Brooklyn. Now more significant lies regarding Marty Markowitz on EB-5 and KPMG on the AY timetable get ignored.)

The cookie-cutter Patch web site is better than the lame Courier-Life site but not as snappy as the Brooklyn Paper. Indeed, as Brooklyn Paper founder Ed Weintrob has pointed out, ever-hyping editor Gersh Kuntzman has made the publication personal and entertaining, using new tools like video.

The five reporters--Park Slope Patch, Bed-Stuy Patch, Carroll Gardens Patch, Fort Greene-Clinton Hill Patch, Prospect Heights Patch--exceed the number of reporters (though not editorial staffers) at the Brooklyn Paper.

Patch has hired real reporters, if newish ones. Stephen Brown, formerly of the Brooklyn Paper, is running the Fort Greene site. (He was tweaked, appropriately, by former boss Kuntzman for not naming his former paper, which is a significant farm team. And Brown just won a big award for his work at the Brooklyn Paper--and Kuntzman won a smaller award.)

Covering Brooklyn?

Patch reporters are supposed to cover fine-grained neighborhood news--and crank out a lot each day, often thin stuff, as the Times suggested. That's fine for a small town or suburb.

In Brooklyn, however, such quotas suggest in-depth coverage will be a challenge. Until and unless a network like Patch decides it needs a few staffers to cover larger Brooklyn issues--and develops an editorial voice with columnists and editorials, rather than just submissions--it won't be competing journalistically with the local weeklies. And those local weeklies don't do that much in-depth reporting themselves.

But it's not Patch's goal to be a great newspaper. And, without printing costs, the business plan seems pretty lean.

With Patch, Brooklyn should be somewhat better served journalistically. But it will still be underserved, with many neighborhoods and broad issues/institutions getting short shrift.

So I'll repeat Brooklyn College professor Paul Moses's observation about Brooklyn's place in the local mediascape: Nowhere in the country do so many people get so little local coverage.

Comments

  1. Hi Norman,
    What a great story, so informative and detailed. Thanks for writing it.
    I wanted to bring to your attention South Brooklyn Post, SouthBrooklynPost.com, a hyper-local online news magazine covering Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Boerum Hill and points nearby.
    We're a independent news magazine, launched just 2 weeks before Carroll Gardens Patch. We're dedicated to in-depth reporting and professional, magazine-style news journalism, and we're developing a roster of professional contributors.
    I'm the editor, and worked as an investigative reporter for 15 years at dailies and a weekly newspaper. South brooklyn Post has a small staff of professionals and we are looking to build a local advertising network and provide a quality community service by doing in-depth journalism on important topics.
    Anyway. Thanks again for this great story, and please check out South Brooklyn Post!
    All best,
    Lisa

    Lisa M. Collins
    Editor
    SouthBrooklynPost.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.