Skip to main content

Atlantic Yards governance bill, round two; new version aims to establish ESDC subsidiary to enhance accountability (& ESDC is supportive)

Update: Here's Jeffries' take, noting that more negotiation will be necessary.

A new bill establishing a different version of a governance entity to oversee Atlantic Yards and make it more accountable has been introduced in the state Assembly by Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries. It's already passed the Corporations, Authorities and Commissions Committee.

(A companion bill has been introduced in the state Senate by Senator Velmanette Montgomery.)

It may mean a different fate than the bill that died last year.

Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) spokesman Warner Johnston stated, "We are aware and have been working with Assemblyman Jeffries and other electeds on elements of this bill. We are extremely supportive of what this bill will mean for the future of the Atlantic Yards project. More details will be forthcoming at a later date."

I'm waiting to learn whether powerful Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has expressed any opinion on the bill.

The rationale and the structure

The essential argument, pushed by BrooklynSpeaks in the summer of 2007, is that projects like Atlantic Yards can change enormously over decades, which is why all other major projects, from Brooklyn Bridge Park to Battery Park City, have their own governance entities and are more accountable to the public.

A lack of such a governance entity leaves more power in the staffers of the ESDC, who have multiple responsibilities and (ultimately) will leave, and thus in developer Forest City Ratner.

The entity would oversee implementation of the design guidelines, coordinate the involvement of state and city agencies responsible for the environmental impact mitigations, coordinate policies regarding transportation, and approve changes to the General Project Plan.

(Today, the Empire State Development Corporation board is expected to approve changes to the Atlantic Yards state and city funding agreements, but those changes have not been made public in anticipation of the vote.)

The big change in the new bill is that, rather than set up a new public benefit corporation, it directs the ESDC to establish a subsidiary corporation for planning and oversight of Atlantic Yards.

Also, unlike the previous Atlantic Yards Governance Act, it does not specify how members of that corporation are appointed, but leaves that to be resolved later. That may be part of why the ESDC is supportive.

BrooklynSpeaks comments

“Today, we are beginning a public campaign to see that the legislation passes both the Assembly and the State Senate and becomes law. For the last three years, BrooklynSpeaks sponsors have advocated for transparency with respect to project governance, as well as for the involvement of the public in the decision-making process. This legislation is an important first step towards those goals,” said Jo Anne Simon, District Leader of the 52nd Assembly District, who pointed to an online petition supporting the legislation."

“Atlantic Yards is still the only State project with no formal oversight or meaningful public representation in decision-making. It is long past time that the special treatment enjoyed by this developer end, and Atlantic Yards is brought onto the same platform as other large ESDC projects,” said Gib Veconi, of the Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council.

Bill details

A 11431 (the same as S 8193) authorizes the Urban Development Corporation (aka ESDC) to create a subsidiary corporation for the purpose of the further planning, design, and oversight of the Atlantic Yards land use improvement and civic project.

It was introduced on June 14 and passed a first committee vote on June 22.

The bill states:
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the public authorities law, in relation to creating a subsidiary corporation for the planning and oversight of the Atlantic yards project

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to establish a project oversight entity, to supervise the Atlantic Yards Project in order to create increased accountability and oversight in the project's governance.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 2827-a of the public authorities law is amended by adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows: Creation of a subsidiary corporation, in 'accordance with section twelve of New York state urban development corporation act, for the purpose of the further planning, design and oversight of the Atlantic Yards land use improvement and civic project.

JUSTIFICATION: New York State projects in New York City are typically governed in one of two ways. The State can pass specific legislation relating to the project, as it did with Battery Park City and Hudson River Park. Alternatively, the State can govern projects under the powers granted to it by the UDC Act of 1968, which it does with Brooklyn Bridge Park, Queens West, Moynihan Station, and other projects. In many cases, the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) has established subsidiaries to formally involve the city and local elected officials in the governance of these projects.

However, they are not obliged to do so by law and, unique among the large state projects in New York City, there is no project subsidiary for Atlantic Yards. The result is that the project is governed in a less transparent, less accountable manner than comparable projects, and without any vehicle for coordinating the city and state agencies involved in the proposed development, or involving local elected officials and the relevant community boards. Further, changes in administration in State government, as well as changes in the ESOC's internal organization, pose risks to the continuity of project oversight which may threaten the realization of Atlantic Yards' stated goals.

To address this, the proposed legislation would establish a subsidiary corporation for the oversight of the Atlantic Yards project. The entity would be created to undertake four primary responsibilities.

First, oversee the implementation of the design guidelines for the architecture of the project. Second, coordinate the involvement of state and city agencies responsible for the environmental impact mitigations. Third, coordinate the development of policy surrounding the project, including transportation concerns. Lastly, approve changes to the general project plan.

Section 1. Section 2827-a of the public authorities law is amended by adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows:
8. NOTWITHSTANDING SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY TAKE ALL ACTION TO CREATE A SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION TWELVE OF THE NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ACT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE FURTHER PLANNING, DESIGN AND OVERSIGHT OF THE ATLANTIC YARDS LAND USE IMPROVEMENT AND CIVIC PROJECT.

S 2. This act shall take effect immediately, provided that the subsidiary corporation authorized in section one of this act must be created within 60 days of such authorization.
Subdivision One

For the record, here's Section 2827-a of the public authorities law, and the Subdivision One referenced in the bill:
§ 2827-a. Subsidiaries of public authorities. 1. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, no state authority shall hereafter have the power to organize any subsidiary corporation unless the legislature shall have enacted a law granting such state authority such power for the organization of a specific corporation, provided, however, that a state authority may organize a subsidiary corporation pursuant to the following requirements:
a. the purpose for which the subsidiary corporation shall be organized shall be for a project or projects which the state authority has the power to pursue pursuant to its corporate purposes;
b. the primary reason for which the subsidiary corporation shall be organized shall be to limit the potential liability impact of the subsidiary's project or projects on the authority or because state or federal law requires that the purpose of a subsidiary be undertaken through a specific corporate structure;
and c. the subsidiary corporation shall make the reports and other disclosures as are required of state authorities, unless the subsidiary corporation's operations and finances are consolidated with those of the authority of which it is a subsidiary.

Last year's bill

Here are details on last year's bill, A09012, the Atlantic Yards Governance Act:
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to establish a project oversight entity known as the Atlantic Yards Development Trust, to supervise the Atlantic Yards Project in order to create increased accountability and oversight in the project's governance.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Article B of the public authorities law is amended by adding a new title 5 to read as follows: (1701) Creation of the Atlantic Yards development trust. 1. There is hereby created the Atlantic Yards development trust which shall be a body corporate and politic, constituting a public benefit corporation. The trust shall come into existence upon the thirtieth day following the appointment of not fewer than eight members of its board as herein provided, and the trust as its corporate existence shall continue until terminated by the legislature.

2. The members of the board of the Atlantic Yards development trust shall be residents of the city of New York and shall be appointed as follows:
(a) Eight members shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the governor, at least one of whom shall be a representative of a not-for-profit, non-governmental or civic organization.
(b) Two members shall be appointed by the speaker of the assembly, in consultation with the member of the assembly that represents the district or districts in which the project is located.
(c) Two members shall be appointed by the temporary president of the senate, in consultation with the senator that represents the district or districts in which the project is located.
(d) Two members shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the mayor of the city of New York.
(e) One member shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the borough president of the borough of Brooklyn, appointed in consultation with Brooklyn community boards two, six and eight.
(f) One non-voting member shall be appointed by the stakeholder council as provided in section seventeen hundred eight of this title.
(g) Each appointing authority, with the exception of the Brooklyn borough president and stakeholder council, may appoint no more than half their members as a city or state employees.
(1703) Powers of the Atlantic Yards development trust. 1. To fulfill its purpose under this title, the trust shall have the following powers, functions, duties and authority subject to the limitations set forth in this title:
(a) to plan, design, develop, construct, operate, and maintain the project;
(b) to implement the general project plan for the project;
(c) to oversee implementation of the design guidelines for the project;
(d) to establish a stakeholder council as provided in section seventeen hundred eight of this title;
(e) to approve changes to the general project plan in consultation with the stakeholder council;
(f) to oversee policies to mitigate environmental impact of the project and coordinate the implementation of these policies with the relevant city and state agencies;
(g) when necessary, to develop additional policy to mitigate anticipated environmental impacts of the projects;
(h) to adopt rules of the procedure for the consultation with the stakeholder council, established pursuant to section seventeen hundred eight of this title;
(i) to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the public using facilities under its jurisdiction;
(j) to exercise the following general corporate powers:
(i) to make and alter by-laws for its organization and internal management

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…