Skip to main content

Hunley-Adossa campaigners said to be rude in front of incumbent James's office

I and others got an email from a Frank Lavergneau, pointing to apparent rude behavior by teenage campaigners for Delia Hunley-Adossa, who's challenging incumbent Letitia (Tish) James in the 35th Council District:

My name is Frank, I'm a Clinton Hill resident, and I'm somewhat interested/involved in local politics. Today, I was enjoying some coffee along Fulton Street, and I didn't believe what I saw. Around 3:00pm, I saw around 10-12 young women carrying Delia Hunnly signs in front of Tish James' campaign office. None of these girls could have been over 16 years of age, and they were a loud, rude, gyrating crew. I didn't see from which direction they arrived, but they were walking back and forth maybe 2 blocks of Fulton (that included Tish's campaign office), so I couldn't imagine they were there for any other reason but to heckle Tish's campaign people.

It seems really disrespectful, unprofessional, and a bit sad that Delia has to resort to sending children to taunt her opponent [and they did taunt, I overheard them saying, "You should work for Dee! She pays gooood!" to the office, who as far as I could tell ignored the entire event]. Furthermore, this is really disrespectful to the neighbors and businesses to send these loud children into our community for this foolishness. Delia should be thoroughly embarrassed, because I am embarrassed for her. I am not a hard "Tish supporter", but this has made the choice for me. I have attached photos I took on my cell phone as proof, and I am sending this email to all the media I could find online or had already, because this kind of behavior needs to be exposed.

More here on Room 8, which means it was posted by someone with some political/media savvy, likely not the original source.

I have a question in to Hunley-Adossa's campaign.


  1. Norman and is amazing how you guys are championing for Letitia James campaign, and she has been known to have her "underground" staff, who maliciously goes out to slander Hunley-Adossa's name. I've seen with my own eyes a guy named Qasar (and if you dont know who I am referring, ask Tish, she knows him very well) go out and harass members of Delia's team, along with tearing down Adossa's posters in countless local business and when caught by business owners themselves, his response was "This is my job, and this is what I was told to do."

    Whats wrong with this photo again? Fact: Yes, these are woman in motion supporting Delia Hunley-Adossa in their district regardless to whether it was in front of Letitia's office or not. I see people out campaigning for a candidate who deserves to be in office...People who have the freedom to campaign in the district they are ready for a change in. People who are sick of Tish's nonsense and not caring for the people.

    By the way "Frank" and Norman since you were so concerned with exposing Adossa, did you ask these girls their age, when you were playing paparazzi? Did you ask them if they are apart of the community? I'm sure you didnt, so dont assume because you know what they say.

    Just a tidbit, I would be very careful in plastering this pic if you assume they are under age 16 and they did not consent to release and publish...Now you are treading in safety and privacy issues...And if they did consent it should be known. Not a good look on you Norm.

    I'm for Hunley-Adossa all the way!

  2. Yanaris--it's fine for you to respond, but the campaign has not responded.

    No one is identifiable from this picture.

  3. The point Norman is that the letter you are posting written by "Frank" is linking a group of woman identified by their age.

    This is not even worth it and as I said in my previous comment, they are a group of woman campaigning in their district. My opinion is that the campaign should not comment at all...There is no law against campaigning. You should know that Norm!

  4. Yanaris, you are clearly full of it. The picture shows no face, and who is going to ask people to sign a "waver" before taking picture when they are on public street, and should not be doing this activity there anyway. That is unrealistic expectation.

    What does "not a good look" mean. He is journalist and reporter. This is news. Perhaps you need to be reacquainted with what titles mean.

    Yanaris, f you have "proof" of bad behavior, perhaps you should present it. Otherwise, no one will believe you.

  5. Okay "Marguerite"...Your just as full of it as need to carefully read my initial statements, before you reply.

    It doesn't matter if you believe me or not, I can care less, the fact is, is that if I know something as a constituent, I am going to say it...First Amendment, get it?

    Secondly, how can you even say "...when they are on public street, and should not be doing this activity there anyway"...There are no laws against campaigning in public areas. Again Marguerite, did you not read my initial statement? Obviously not. Or better yet, go to Board of Elections and figure out the rules for yourself. Its all records that we residents have access to.

    Thirdly, the fact of the matter is not that the picture is out, because again the photo is showing these people doing nothing wrong, but its the accusations that accompany the photo in the letter written supposedly by "Frank", with the females being 16 yrs. old. It doesnt matter if your showing a face or not, but YES, you are treading in safety and privacy issues. So instead of talking just for the sake of talking, DO YOUR RESEARCH MARGUERITE!

    And I'm not sure if you would call Norm a journalist, but there is a difference from being informative and biased...and if I see something or read something that is worth rebutting, I AM GOING TO DO JUST THAT! Get it together need to come correct.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.