Skip to main content

At the Comptroller debate, Yassky's contradiction on AY

The Comptroller debate sponsored by CNG and Brooklyn Independent Television is now online, and it's worth a look, especially Council Member David Yassky's critical-but-supportive answer to an Atlantic Yards question.

(Here's some more cursory print coverage, which said that City Council Members Yassky and John Liu "spoke out more adamantly against the project;" actually, while they were critical, they don't fundamentally oppose the project.)

At about 21:40, moderator Brian Vines raised a question about Atlantic Yards, noting that people worry that "we might end up with a giant hole in the middle of Brooklyn." He asked, "If Bruce Ratner were to ask you for more government assistance to jump-start this project, or for a loan that's government-guaranteed, would you consider it?"

"No way," responded Yassky. "Not only shouldn't that project get more taxpayer money, they should give back the taxpayer money they've got already. The developers of that project already got $40 million of your money, of taxpayer dollars, for a project that so far hasn't gone anywhere, and it shouldn't be built with taxpayer money at all."

(I believe the figure is much higher than $40 million.)

"It is outrageous, the MTA, I went and testified against the MTA doing this. One day they raise the fare, by 25 cents, and two weeks later, they give another $80 million in subsidy to the private developer of this project. They had agreed that the developer would pay $100 million for the right to build there. They said: don't worry, you can just give us $20 million, and you'll pay the other $80 million, maybe later, some time, who knows when. That is such an affront to the men and women of New York City who have to pay to get on the subway."

Actually, that's not a gift of $80 million, given that the $20 million covers less than one-third of the railyard, though it certainly offers Forest City Ratner a significant financial advantage. More importantly, the deal allows the developer to save at least $100 million on a replacement railyard.

Yassky's contradiction

"The project should not be built with taxpayer money," Yassky continued, as if ignoring the $305 million in direct subsidies already pledged and a series of tax breaks and other advantages. "I've been fighting to get a right-sized project that fits within the context of Central Brooklyn, the basically brownstone neighborhoods of Fort Greene and Prospect Heights. There is a good project in there, but it should be be right-sized. And it should not built with taxpayer money."

But the only way Forest City Ratner would build it is with taxpayer money, and a "right-sized project" might require more subsidies. Still, Yassky thinks it's a "good project," so he's been unwilling to challenge such things as the state's dubious finding of blight.

(Also, at about 12 minutes in, listen for Yassky's gratuitous reference to Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz's summer concert series. Markowitz has endorsed Yassky.)

Project supporters

City Council Member Melinda Katz said no to more subsidies, but quickly segued to talk about jobs and stalled projects but basically ignored Atlantic Yards.

City Council David Weprin seemed somewhat uninformed, suggesting, "if you're talking about tax-exempt bonds, it could be a win-win." While he said he wouldn't support subsidies other than a federal tax exemption," he seemed unaware of the existing subsidies.

Liu threads the needle

City Council Member Liu offered an "adamant no" to more subsidies, saying that the project "has promised the stars... and so far has delivered very, very little for the communities. Even though we have seen hundreds of people taken out of their homes. It is a shame."

Hold on. The hundreds of people were not "taken out" of their homes; some left somewhat reluctantly, others left more reluctantly. Many residential owners got a pretty good deal--if they accepted a gag order--while many residential renters did not.

Liu said he wanted to hold the administration and the developer--on AY and other projects--accountable to the promises of jobs and housing.

If so, maybe he should be looking more closely at the housing promises for AY. Like Yassky, Liu offered critical words but not a fundamental critique.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.