Skip to main content

Looking at the 33rd district race, AY, and some undercurrents

So, the debate Monday night among six of the seven candidates running to succeed City Council Member David Yassky got a significant amount of coverage, but, since no one looked closely at the Atlantic Yards angle, I’ll address AY and some other issues.

(I didn’t attend the debate at St. Francis College, but Noticing New York’s Michael D.D. White shared a digital file.)

The Brooklyn Paper’s Politicrasher columnist didn’t mention the AY issue. (Clarified: I originally attributed the column to the prolific Gersh Kuntzman, who was spotted at the debate, but can't be certain, though I do believe he at least had a hand in it.)

The column called the debate “the latest in a seemingly endless series of mirth-free events that are doing more to drive people away from the political process than towards it. The main problem is that the candidates differ little on substance, leaving an audience member to ponder the not-so-subtle, and not-so-appealing, differences in each candidate’s style.”

Here’s more from Aaron Short (“Fascinatingly normal debate”), Sarah Portlock (“long and routine”), and Louise Crawford (“But for the most part, they're all on the same page...).

Political undercurrents

While the candidates bring different (and significant) experience, the insider newspaper City Hall points to some political undercurrents; candidates Jo Anne Simon, a lawyer and district leader from Boerum Hill, has longstanding tensions with Brooklyn Democratic leader Vito Lopez, whose chief of staff, Stephen Levin, was the one candidate who didn’t attend the debate. (Nor has Levin yet returned a questionnaire to CBID.)

And Yassky has yet to endorse his former chief of staff, Evan Thies, apparently because he’s agreed to stay neutral to gain Lopez’s endorsement in his run for Comptroller.

City Hall suggests that the leaders are Levin and Simon (who has ties to Assemblyman Joan Millman)--though the number of candidates can make the race interesting, and the presence of Hasidic candidate Isaac Abraham could cut into Levin’s hope for a strong Hasidic vote.

During the debate, longtime activist and affordable housing developer Ken Diamondstone cited his independence, saying the “critical and unspoken subtext” of the race was the candidates’ relationship to the Democratic party. He took a potshot at Simon for claiming to be a reformer but, according to the City Hall report, agreeing with Lopez 80 percent of the time.

Against Bloomberg

On the Brooklyn Paper’s web site, White commented that the event “could hardly be considered a “yawn” given the candidates’ pretty much universal objections to the current administration’s development policies and big project initiatives. Isn’t Bloomberg’s ability to create such unity a fascination in itself?”

(Interestingly enough--most of the comments on the Brooklyn Paper’s web site came from supporters of Isaac Abraham, who’s lagging in fundraising.)

Indeed, all the candidates endorsed a statement that the mayor did an end-run around the public in extending term limits.

Perhaps the hosts, the Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats and the Independent Neighborhood Democrats, might have put the candidates more on the spot, asking them, for example, what they think of Yassky’s performance and how they differ with the absent candidate, Levin.

An odd district

Given that the 33rd District (I’m a resident) is shaped somewhat like a bat, reaching from Greenpoint to Park Slope, the race has attracted candidates from various places: Abraham from Williamsburg; environmentalist Ken Baer from Park Slope; Doug Biviano (who spoke with authority, focusing on education) from Brooklyn Heights; Diamondstone from Boerum Hill; Levin from Greenpoint; Simon from Boerum Hill; and Thies from Williamsburg.

(Map from City Hall)

Not surprisingly, in comments at the debate and on their web sites, the three candidates from the northern part of the district focus on development challenges in those areas, but Thies--who’s been involved in development issues in Northern Brooklyn--also stressed Atlantic Yards.

Other factors beyond geography include gender--Simon is the only woman in the race--and potential bloc voting in the Hasidic community.

About AY and development

From comments at the debate, Baer, Biviano, and Diamondstone all opposed Atlantic Yards, standing with the Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn coalition. Baer and Diamondstone have been longstanding opponents.

Simon, who has paid critical attention to Atlantic Yards, has allied herself with the mend-it-don’t-end-it coalition, BrooklynSpeaks. She announced that she promised not to take contributions from developers.

Thies, who has not been associated with DDDB, forcefully criticized AY as “a gaping monument to how bad the city and state have gotten at these development plans.”
While Abraham didn't say anything at the debate about Atlantic Yards, a questionnaire he returned to CBID indicated his opposition "from the very first minute."

Baer, Diamondstone, and Thies agreed that AY was the biggest boondoggle among projects. Simon said it’s very hard to know, “because we don't have good numbers” on many of the projects, though she also criticized “single site control,” which also applies to AY.

Several of the candidates emphasized community planning and community board reform, an issue that Borough President Marty Markowitz has yet to endorse. Simon cited her work on shaping development at Hoyt and Schermerhorn.

Thies has probably the most extensive set of suggestions, proposing "360 Degree Planning":
Evan has proposed that the Uniform Land Use Review Process – the City’s planning process – be amended to include input on any major project from the departments of education, transportation, sanitation, buildings, police and fire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…