Skip to main content

What's right with this picture? For West Side yards, the market speaks

What a difference a few years make. The city's market-driven effort to develop the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's West Side yards continues in blinding contrast to its fait accompli with the MTA's Vanderbilt Yard in Brooklyn.

Four years ago, the city announced its support of a deal for the 22-acre Atlantic Yards project over and beyond the railyard; crucially, the latter would occupy less than 40 percent of the site. The New York Times offered further anointment with a rapturous review (A Garden of Eden Grows in Brooklyn) by architecture critic Herbert Muschamp.

But, hey, that's no way to develop railyards, is it? PlaNYC 2030 says there should be much more community consultation. Real estate usually generates a better deal when there's an open bidding process. And the design of megaprojects generally improves when there's a detailed request for proposals and an opportunity for the public and interested parties to weigh in.

So today it was big news that five developers had released their plans for the Hudson Yards. The New York Times gave it a full page (B5), with renderings of each proposal, under the headline In Railyards, Seeing a Blank Canvas on the Hudson. (The renderings at right are all from the Times.) Metro made it the lead, headlined Five visions for new West Side. A piece in the New York Sun was headlined Proposals for Hudson Yards Reach High, Green

The market speaking

The New York Post devoted a page and two-thirds, under the headlines: THE NEXT 'WEST' THING: DUELING DEVELOPERS PITCH THEIR PLANS FOR RAIL-YARD RENAISSANCE, reporting:
The Post reported:
Deputy Mayor Daniel Doctoroff called the proposals "the culmination and the catalyst" for developing the far West Side into a district of office towers, high-rise residential buildings, cultural centers and parks that has been dubbed Hudson Yards.
"This is the market speaking," Doctoroff said of the competing proposals from some of the city's biggest developers. "It's clearly telling us we have a special opportunity in Hudson Yards."


Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn immediately pointed out that the city and state "gagged the market" in Brooklyn.

DDDB said, "A legitimate RFP process for the Vanderbilt Rail Yards would not have led to an attenuated field of only 2 developers for the best and largest piece of available developable real estate in Brooklyn."

Rebuttal, anyone?

Limited pool of developers?

The closest thing to a rebuttal came in federal appellate court last month, when, arguing in favor of a dismissal of the Atlantic Yards eminent domain challenge, Empire State Development Corporation attorney Preeta Bansal defended the developer-driven proposal by claiming that only a few developers can do projects like Atlantic Yards.

But such developers obviously exist. The Daily News reported, in an article headlined Five companies bid to remake six blocks of Hudson Yards area, that Doctoroff called the bidders "perhaps the five leading development firms in the city."

The five companies: Brookfield Properties, the Related Companies, Extell Development, a Durst-Vornado joint venture, and a Tishman Speyer-Morgan Stanley joint venture.

Note that Forest City Ratner was not on the list. Extell, the only bidder that responded to a Vanderbilt Yard RFP issued 18 months after Atlantic Yards was announced, is on the list. Was Doctoroff talking offhandedly or was he unconsciously dissing Forest City Ratner?

Another increasingly questionable explanation for Atlantic Yards may simply be that, once a developer owns a scarce commodity like a basketball team, "it is not really up to us then to go out and try to find a better deal," as Andrew Alper, former president of the New York City Economic Development Corporation, famously told City Council on 5/4/04.

More contrasts

The obvious contrast for the press yesterday was the previous fait accompli planned for the West Side side. Metro reported:
Unlike when the ill-fated Jets Stadium was planned for that 26-acre site, the public is getting a chance to weigh in on the proposals. Comments will be accepted at an exhibit of the designs, which opens today and runs through Dec. 3.

The exhibit will be open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily--except for Thanksgiving--at the corner of 43rd Street and Vanderbilt Avenue, across from Grand Central Terminal.

There were no such unveilings of competing proposals before the city and state announced support for Atlantic Yards. Heck, the Atlantic Yards Information Center only opened its doors to invitees.

Comments

  1. It is time to go back and have a proper bid process for development the Atlantic Yards/Vanderbilt Yards. It would be nice if the bid were structured the way Hudson Yards bid was structured so that developers know exactly what they should be bidding on and bid on the same thing. Also, Because of the Atlantic Yards/Vanderbilt Yards site is long and narrow it would be quite conducive to bid out the site out as multiple sites that potentially would be awarded to more than one developer.

    Wouldn’t it be nice if multiple developers actually felt as if they were “allowed” by the State and City administrations to bid on the Atlantic Yards/Vanderbilt Yards site?

    Wouldn’t it be nice if multiple bids generated significantly better designs that the public could comment upon?

    Wouldn’t it be nice if Forest City Ratner, already the owner of adjacent existing properties being publicly subsidized to cope with their economic failure, did not bid this time? And that we are not faced with more failure and an undeserved monopolistic monoculture of ownership?

    Wouldn’t it be nice if the New York City Council would wise up and recapture all that money it plans to dole out to Forest City Ratner and wouldn’t it be nice to know, with a real bid process, what this site could actually be worth the MTA? Wouldn’t it be nice to see that money spent on worthy projects instead?

    Wouldn’t it be nice if the Atlantic Yards/Vanderbilt Yards were not being built with the use of pretextual eminent domain to ratchet up megadeveloper windfall while destroying neighborhood buildings we should keep?

    Wouldn’t it be nice to see something built that was respectful to our neighborhoods, our intelligence and basic concepts of integrity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.