Skip to main content

Downzonings, density, and context

There's a lot to mine from the inaugural issue (Spring 2007) of City Limits Investigates (CLI), the quarterly offshoot of City Limits, which concerns the challenges of building affordable housing in a time of steadily rising construction costs.

One issue is the city's capacity for density, and the attendant context.

Even as the city has began upzonings, increasing opportunities for density in former manufacturing zones and near transit hubs (and, in the case of Atlantic Yards, letting the state override zoning without a similar public process), other neighborhoods have pressed for downzonings, ensuring against out-of-scale development.

For example, in his 2005 State of the Borough address, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz stated, "But smart development is not destroying the lovely character of Brooklyn’s most suburban neighborhoods. Southern Brooklyn has many neighborhoods that are primarily residential and dominated by single family detached homes. I am committed to the down-zoning of these neighborhoods, because we must preserve the community pride that makes Brooklyn great."

Going too far

There's certainly a logic to that, but it can also go too far. As CLI explains, some 40 percent of Staten Island has been downzoned, including some segments near the Staten Island Railway:
Developers who built the cheap, unattractive housing that fueled neighborhoods' demands for the new zoning restrictions have to take some of the blame. But there's little doubt that the city's tighter rules are suppressing not just ugly, out-of-scale buildings but also quality housing development that could be affordable. "They've driven the cost of land through the roof because of downzoning," says Randy Lee, a developer on Staten Island. "The problem you have is in a lot of new zones, they wanted to eliminate two-family houses, so you eliminated the rentals and those rentals represented an affordable housing stock. Almost all zoning that allowed townhouses was eliminated. There is no zoning left for garden apartments, condo housing, senior aparments... And the upzonings don't make up for it, he says. "You can't punch the pillow down in Staten Island and people to pop up on the Upper West Side or Williamsubrg. They pop up in Rockland County or New Jersey."


That also increases the pressure to build as big as possible elsewhere in the city, including projects like Atlantic Yards. Similarly, as I've noted, not-so-dense developments near transit, such as the Atlantic Commons in Fort Greene and the Nehemiah Houses in East New York, in hindsight appear unwise. But they were the only developments the market would support at the time.

Density and balance

CLI cites the city's new push for density:
In his April speech unveiling PlaNYC, however, Mayor Bloomberg announced a push for new zoning rules to increase housing in areas near mass transit lines. Even harsh critics of the Bloomberg administration acknowledge that zoning requires a very delicate balance. "You've got to be careful with density," notes one former political opponent of the mayor's. "How dense a city do you really want to live in?"... And zoning for more density can strain public services and alter the character of beloved neighborhoods.

That's one of the questions presented by Atlantic Yards. Urban planner and Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn Board Member Ron Shiffman has repeatedly argued that the project would strain the local infrastructure.

In a more optimistic take, Atlantic Yards landscape architect Laurie Olin told the New York Observer in February that the challenges culd be overcome: "It’s the future: how to live wisely and well in close quarters with good spaces and environmental conditions and with the highest qualities. What a project!"

Regional challenge

Markowitz and some other Atlantic Yards supporters have backed the project, at the size proposed, because "we need" the affordable housing. While the city suffers a huge deficit of affordable housing, and Atlantic Yards might make a small but not insignificant dent in that (but also might lead to the demise of affordable housing nearby), there is an argument for a larger context.

As noted, at some point, density strains livability. And the context is not only within the city, it's regional. As CLI points out:
"Some of this should be a regional issue," Bill Carbine, HPD's Assistant commisisoner for Neighborhood Preservation, said at a recent conference. "If there's affordable housing in Jersey City or in Yonkers, that helps all of us with this problem."

Meanwhile, the combination of the housing crunch and low incomes means there's a lot of de facto affordable housing in New York, where several families cram into apartments and houses, living in substandard conditions, sometimes violating the zoning code,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.