Skip to main content

At three discussions, the Atlantic Yards burr in Bloomberg's boomtown

If you’re having a discussion about Brooklyn and development issues, Atlantic Yards, it seems, inevitably comes to the fore.

At a panel discussion last Thursday at the Brooklyn Public Library on equitable use of eminent domain, Atlantic Yards was presented as an example of what not to do. At a 5/5/07 seminar on the Municipal Art Society’s Livable Neighborhoods Program, Atlantic Yards was suggested as exemplifying how developers “leapfrog” communities. (I’ll write about both events shortly.)

And Atlantic Yards came up several times on Saturday, Neighborhood Day, a day of panel discussions keyed to the Roots of Modern Brooklyn exhibit at Borough Hall, which focuses on the borough’s struggle to revive in the 1970s and 1980s. (It's on view through May 18 at Borough Hall and will move to Sovereign Bank, 130 Court Street at Atlantic Avenue, from June 15-30. It's well worth a visit, and at a later date I'll write more about the exhibit and the panels. )

No more people power?

Near the end of a discussion Saturday that was presented live on BCAT, Park Slope activist and former Assemblyman Joe Ferris offered a contrast between the 1970s and today: “The thing that troubles me now is the recentralization of power. We showed people that, at the block level, you could make a difference.”

Ferris observed how neighborhood activists once could influence their community boards, their borough president, City Council, and even—when it existed—the Board of Estimate. “Now I see, with Atlantic Yards, that has been circumvented," he said. "ULURP [the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure] is being obliterated by an unelected group of people.”

The moderator, author Pete Hamill, noted that time for the 90-minute program had nearly expired, observing wryly, “I heard the fatal words ‘Atlantic Yards’ and knew we could have another two hours” to continue.

"Absolutely reasonable" AY opposition

Earlier that afternoon, a panel of journalists described their experiences in the 1970s and 1980s working for the feisty Brooklyn Phoenix weekly (1972-1995).

At one point, it was suggested that there isn’t much community activism today around development. Panelist JoAnne Wasserman, deputy metro editor of the New York Daily News, responded, “I have two words for you: Daniel Goldstein.” (Wasserman didn’t know that the Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn spokesman was in the room until he raised his hand.)

“Daniel is rather a vocal opponent of Atlantic Yards. He’s not going away any time soon,” she continued. “Y’know, there are plenty of people who live in that neighborhood who, for a whole variety of absolutely reasonable conditions oppose the project and would completely disagree with what you have to say. And they’re pretty organized.” She also cited activism regarding the sale of the Starrett City complex.

Bloomberg's undemanding boomtown

Another Phoenix alumnus, Michael Powell of the New York Times, didn’t address Atlantic Yards but criticized the city’s posture toward developers. “I think it’s quite clear that the Bloomberg administration was taken—for a time, it was taken unawares by the sort of explosion of development. That’s one way of putting it. They’ve not put on all the building inspectors, they’ve not beefed up—I mean, this is not something that they should be shocked about, and if they’re shocked about it, that’s shocking. This has been something that has been predicted. Their own reports have looked at it—their reports are terrific. The city quite accurately predicted what’s happened in the past five or six years. And it seems to me that there are a lot of templates for how you develop neighborhoods. You build high-rise up along broader avenues, preserving the interior--this is not rocket science.”

“But there is, along with sort of the gold rush fevers that are out there, there is this real sense that, well, somehow it’s déclassé to get in the way of development, ‘Shut up already, you’re on the wrong side of history.’ … In Park Slope and in some other places, there’s actually been some pretty smart work done,” Powell observed.

(Actually, the rezoning of the central and northern segment of Park Slope was controversial because it increased density on the Fourth Avenue corridor without inclusionary zoning requested by affordable housing advocates. However, the South Slope rezoning below 15th Street did include incentives for affordable housing. See the Gotham Gazette article today on the overworked Department of Buildings.)

Powell continued, “But the city has moved—I think, from my observations living out here--rather slowly and has been I think too slow to challenge developers. Not necessarily to say ‘Don’t develop’ but… a boomtown presents a great opportunity for a city, because with a boomtown, you can demand things of developers and make them jump through hoops that you can’t make them jump through in 1982. They were just happy that anybody wants to put a shovel in the ground. Right now, everyone wants to put a shovel in the ground and therefore there should be, it seems to me, a great opportunity to demand a lot. And I haven’t seen that, and that’s too bad.”

Powell's comments, at least to my mind, contrast with those from Andrew Alper, then president of the New York City Economic Development Corporation, who said at a 5/4/04 City Council hearing regarding Atlantic Yards: So, they came to us, we did not come to them. And it is not really up to us then to go out and find to try to a better deal. I think that would discourage developers from coming to us, if every time they came to us we went out and tried to shop their idea to somebody else. So we are actively shopping, but not for another sports arena franchise for Brooklyn.”

While sports franchises may be scarce commodities, Atlantic Yards, above all, is a deal for what Forest City Enterprises VP Chuck Ratner has called "a great piece of real estate."

AY inevitability

Others speaking on Saturday looked at Atlantic Yards as positive, or at least inevitable. Dennis Holt of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, another Phoenix alum, has written positively about the project. “It is going to be built,” he said with certainty. (Still, legal challenges are pending.) Holt admiringly called AY “as dramatic an enterprise… as anything we’ve done.”

At another panel Saturday, photographer Tony Velez presented a slideshow of his diverse work, mainly of working-class Brooklynites. Among the landscapes was a shot of a smoke plume in the distance, the World Trade Center under attack, as shot from Velez’s apartment at Grand Army Plaza in Prospect Heights.

Another photo captured the eerie Towers of Light, the anniversary projection aimed to fill the Twin Towers' space in the skyline. “This is before Ratner’s development comes in. This view will be gone for me,” Velez said matter-of-factly, the observations of a photographer assessing a landscape.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…