The issue is not just "affordable" units but level of affordability. Which should've been recognized in 2010.
For those wondering if developer Greenland Forest City Partners can meet the 2025 affordable housing deadline by building three "50% affordable" towers, as indicated in a state document I published yesterday --or even by building two towers, with one "100% affordable"--there's something important to remember. From the Development Agreement As I wrote in April 2019, the project's guiding Development Agreement --screenshot at right--simply defines affordable units as those "subject to income and rent restrictions" as part of a city or state regulatory agreement. Rents must be set at no more than 160% of Area Median Income (AMI) or, if higher, the highest percentage of AMI used in city or state housing programs. (So far, they've gone up to 165% of AMI.) Unmentioned was that a certain fraction must typically be low-income units for tax-code purposes. A middle-income skew From BrooklynSpeaks But that leaves room for a disproportion...