Skip to main content

In race to succeed Millman, a designated successor, a union/WFP-backed rival, and a pox-on-all gadfly

The race to replace retiring 52nd District Assemblymember Joan Millman covers a district including Brooklyn Heights, Gowanus, and parts of Park Slope.

Millman has had an intermittent presence regarding Atlantic Yards, so it's not like we should expect her replacement to make it a priority, not with other pressing issues in the district. As noted below, none of the candidates gave particularly incisive answers when asked an Atlantic Yards question at a recent debate.

The overview

The race involves Millman's designated successor, attorney and district leader Jo Anne Simon (also endorsed by Public Advocate Letitia James and Comptroller Scott Stringer, among others), who has the most local money;  Communications Workers of America political and legislative director (self-described as "consumer advocate, union economist") Pete Sikora, endorsed by Mayor Bill de Blasio, Council Members Brad Lander & Steve Levin, and the Working Families Party, who has the most union money; and building superintendent and local gadfly Doug Biviano, who's running a shoestring insurgent campaign and is backed by former mayoral candidate Sal Albanese, who also ran as a reformer.

Simon has endorsements from the New York Times and the Citizens Union; Sikora has the Daily News nod.  Here's a NY1 debate and a WNYC election guide. Here's Brooklyn Heights Blog debate coverage, including some useful video.

Here are the Citizens Union questionnaires for Biviano, Sikora, and Simon, which list priorities.

Biviano's priorities:


Sikora's priorities:


Simon's priorities:


Hammering away at taint

It's been an interesting race to watch, since Biviano, aided by consultant Gary Tilzer, has hammered away at what he considers signs of taint, some of which are clearer than others.

Without Instant Runoff Voting, in which voters rank candidates--which I think would be helpful--a protest vote for Biviano likely helps one of the other candidates.

(A similar but more dramatic situation came up in 2009 when Biviano and Simon were among seven candidates to succeed David Yassky, and Levin, a protege of County Democratic Chair Vito Lopez, won a very split election. Levin turned out to be not to be a Lopez clone, though Instant Runoff Voting probably would have elected a candidate opposed to the Brooklyn Democratic machine.)

Consider Biviano's statement: “The [sic] are sharks who will hurt our community working for both of my opponents in this race. Berlin Rosen for Sikora and Brooklyn Boss Seddio and his Gang for Simon.”

The role of consultants Berlin Rosen--a mega-firm that represents the mayor, Forest City Ratner, the Brooklyn Public Library, and, as Sikora takes pain to point out, some virtuous nonprofits like Greenpeace--in city politics is troubling, as noted by the Star-Revue. Indeed, Crain's just published an article about how consultants like Berlin Rosen play a lobbyist-like role but don't register as lobbyists.

Sikora has spent more than $65,000 on Berlin Rosen, But Biviano ascribes a little too much power to one consultant, claiming: "Berlin Rosen has taken away from us the power of governing decisions in our neighborhoods. They control government agencies like the Brooklyn Public Library and our local elections." 

Sikora has received more than $42,000 in assistance from the Working Families Party, by far the party's biggest lift. (The CWA is part of the WFP.) The disclosure has taken a while. Sikora's campaign also has transferred nearly $23,000 to the WFP.

Regarding Simon, Biviano points to support from County Democratic Leader Frank Seddio--Simon says she doesn't have to be in lockstep--and to a contribution from a board member of Brooklyn Bridge Park who supports condos in the park.

As to Biviano, his rivals question his ability to work in any coalition and his record of work in the community.

A video via Brooklyn Heights Blog where candidates ask each other questions (go to 13:27):




The Atlantic Yards question

At a recent debate in Prospect Heights, moderator Janet Babin of WNYC asked a version of a question I had posed: "Would you have approved of compromise regarding Atlantic Yards, setting a new timetable for affordable housing... how can you change deals like these to ensure that people of Brooklyn who truly need affordable housing can get it?"

Sikora said, "The deal doesn't provide enough affordable housing, particularly for lower income. The affordable housing that's in Atlantic Yards going forward should reflect what the neighborhood used to be like... people got pushed out. I would have approved of this compromise, because it seems to be better than the alternative, but we should back up and not get put in a box as a community on these kinds of deals."

He went on to extol his capacity in forging coalitions, "so we don't get stuck with these kind of disasters.". He didn't mention--nor did have time to do so--that the Working Families Party was co-founded by New York ACORN, which endorsed the Atlantic Yards affordable housing plan. Neither the WFP nor ACORN's successor organization, New York Communities for Change, criticized the configuration of affordable housing in the next two towers, which skews toward middle-income households.

Biviano's response: "I want to put this into the real perspective, the special interests driving these issues... Affordable housing is a bandaid on a cancer, it's because of the tax breaks and abatements given to developers... it's about public giveaways. You want it eliminated, control the campaign finance laws, such that candidates can't take large contributions and then give away all our public properties and overdevelop, overbuild, and then deplete the tax base so we can't really address affordable housing."

He's right that state campaign finance law needs reform; this election likely would have more candidates, and a more robust debate, if there were matching funds, as with city elections. But it's unclear what Biviano might do, or how he would "Return the power of governing back to the neighborhoods," as stated in his Citizens Union questionnaire.

"As the only candidate here who was involved in Atlantic Yards at all, publicly, I can tell you about the very, very long fight," responded Simon, a member of BrooklynSpeaks, which helped negotiate the compromise. "So here's the thing: the affordability levels were not set by anybody other than the developer, in accordance with a Community Benefits Agreement with certain organizations, many of which were created by the developer.... It actually didn't benefit very many people at all. What we have done in this agreement is we have moved up the housing, we have expanded the number of apartments and the size of the apartments to more adequately deal with families. The affordability levels were set by HUD, and there was actually no opportunity for us to do that. We'd be happy to work with that going forward."

Note that the terms of the agreement and ESDC letter deal with the timetable but not the size of the apartments. That was a discretionary decision--there are more two-bedroom apartments and now three-bedroom apartments--in the next two towers, but at the cost of a shift in affordability, another discretionary decision. The uncritical endorsement of the deal by Simon and others papered over the complexity.

More from the debate

The Brooklyn Eagle offered a good summary of other issues in the debate, including the Common Core, local control of rent laws, endorsement of Zephyr Teachout for governor (Biviano, Sikora yes, Simon undecided), public libraries (a rather cursory discussion).

Also note the discussion of fundraising:
Probed by Babin on finances, Sikora said he has raised roughly $194,000 for his campaign; Simon reported roughly $190,000; Biviano said he has raised $7,000.
Simon said she has not taken any money from developers with projects in the community. Sikora said that he wasn’t taking any money from real estate.
“But you’re exploiting every campaign finance loophole that’s out there,” Simon said. [an apparent reference to the WFP help.]
Biviano said that the other candidates raised more money than he did because they were beholden to special interests. He was cut short when he tried to list individual donors who gave to his competitors’ campaigns.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.