Skip to main content

Brodsky: "it seems... provable" that MTA did not fulfill fiduciary duty with Atlantic Yards deal (but he won't look further)

Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, who in early June criticized the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) expected acceptance of a lowered initial cash offer for the Vanderbilt Yard from Forest City Ratner as a violation of its fiduciary duty but then remained quiet as the deal proceeded, has returned to his criticism, saying "it seems to me provable" that the MTA did not fulfill that duty with Atlantic Yards and two other deals.

However, he indicated that the Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, which he chairs and which has looked closely at the Yankee Stadium deal, would not look into the Atlantic Yards deal. (As noted below, I think there's room for an inquiry.)

At panel on MTA

Brodsky spoke last night on a panel on the future of the MTA, sponsored by New York Civic and held at the Museum of the City of New York. The panel was held just after Gov. David Paterson nominated Jay Walder to be chairman and CEO.

Early on, he offered some familiar criticisms:
The MTA is a state authority. State authorities are generally Soviet-style bureaucracies that are accountability to nobody. They are not part of the executive branch under the state constitution. They were created for two reasons: to excuse elected officials from the political responsibility for doing unpopular things like raising fares and to borrow money without the full faith and credit of the state behind them. We can discuss whether those are worthy outcomes.

For the last 20 years, whatever virtues they've had have essentially been lost to visible notice, as we've seen them be the vehicles for a set of bad decisions, corruption, and then strange decisions. The decision to put $4 billion in public money into Yankee Stadium was made by a state authority under the direction of the mayor. Now you can can like that or not like but the power of state authorities is enormous.


There's considerable debate on whether Yankee Stadium is $2 billion in public money, much less $4 billion.

Brodsky continued:
We took a stab at reform in 2006, when Governor Pataki signed a bill I authored, which made several reforms... But we made a mistake in that bill. We severed the board of the MTA from the CEO function. That was a mistake which we've now repaired. One of the things I think we need to consider, as the new CEO of the MTA apparently takes his position, is what are the fiduciary obligations--that is, the duty to the system--of the leadership of the MTA, as opposed to their duty to the people who appointed them, the mayor and the governor. That is a matter that I believe will be considered at some length in the confirmation process.

He said in early June, regarding Atlantic Yards, that the board had a fiduciary duty.

Regarding Atlantic Yards

A little later in his remarks, Brodsky brought up AY:
The fundamental reform we adopted in the fiscal package two months ago was to restore to the chairman of the board and the CEO a fiduciary duty to the system, rather than a political allegiance to the mayor and the governor. And that independence will be at the heart of whether Mr. Walder is able to succeed in bringing reform to the MTA.

Take the Seven line extension, take the West Side Yards, take Atlantic Yards. In all those cases, it seems to be me provable that, whether you like the projects or you don't--I'm not taking a position on the projects--that the MTA's fiduciary responsibility to the system and the riders was to maximize the value of the assets it was putting out. It could not do that in many of those cases.

That struck me as a violation of the fiduciary duty. But because I passed a law in 2006 that had a mistake in it, we had a CEO of the MTA who was not bound by the fiduciary duty. Now we can fix that. The law gives Mr. Walder a clear defense that, when the next time the Mayor says, "Go build me a subway line to nowhere." Whether he will use that will become, I think, the chief measure of his success or his failure.


What is to be done?

After the panel, I asked Brodsky if there was anything for his committee to do regarding the deal for the MTA's Vanderbilt Yard. He said he didn't think there was, but that Walder could look into it.

I didn't say so, but I suspect that Brodsky's counterpart on the Senate side, Bill Perkins, wouldn't mind some help in getting questions answered

Beyond that, Brodsky, who has examined the curious assessments for the Yankee Stadium site, produced to generate PILOTs (payments-in-lieu-of-taxes) needed to pay off construction bonds, could look into the same issue regarding the Atlantic Yards arena site.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.