Skip to main content

Transit-oriented development, the lagging MTA, and the AY example

Maybe the issue is regional, and the outsize scale of the Atlantic Yards project relates partly because of the failure to develop housing at sufficient density and affordability in the car-dependent suburbs.

Indeed, there’s a lot of transit-oriented development (TOD) taking place—in New Jersey, at least. “New York State is more than 15 years behind New Jersey in its smart growth and TOD policies,” declared Ellyn Shannon, a transportation planner for the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee (PCAC) to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

She spoke at a symposium Wednesday on Transit Oriented Development in the New York Metropolitan Region. The PCAC two weeks ago released a report, Where is the Metropolitan Transportation Authority on Transit Oriented Development, calling on the MTA and its operating agencies to work in partnership with State and local governments, community organizations, and private developers to encourage TOD, which it defines as "a pedestrian-friendly, compact, mixed-use development pattern that lies within walking distance of a transit station and contains or adjoins a core commercial area."

For New York, the issue is the suburbs more than the city--after all, as one panelist pointed out, most development in the city could be considered TOD. Or, perhaps not. Though the symposium conspicuously avoided controversial developments like Hudson Yards and Atlantic Yards, Jon Orcutt, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign
offered a caution in the Q&A period. “There’s a lot of bad car development going on,” he said, citing big box stores on Bruckner Boulevard in the Bronx or in Red Hook.

Even projects near transportation hubs, he added, citing Atlantic Yards, show “it’s possible to do design that isn’t the best transit-oriented development.” TSTC has issued some tough criticism of the transit plan for Atlantic Yards and contributed to the criticisms voiced by BrooklynSpeaks.


Larry Gould of NYC Transit said some posit TOD as “strong medicine. The fact is, TOD creates wonderful places to live.” Still, he lamented that in many suburban communities the zoning code doesn’t allow mixed-use facilities.

Indeed, the PCAC recommends "coordinating State policy and providing State resources to assist local governments in planning for transit-friendly development, linking land use and transportation in the regional transportation planning process," seeking increased resources for TOD, and working closely with local governments.

Community must be heard

But how get there? "It is a community engagement process,” said Vivian Baker of NJ Transit, which has been planning developments at land and parking lots near train stations statewide.

Long Island, reported Eric Alexander of Vision Long Island, progressive planners are fighting a legacy of single-use zoning for single-family residences that have left isolated car-dependent neighborhoods. There are numerous TOD projects in the works, including on around Nassau Coliseum.

“We need 50,000 units of affordable housing,” he said. One small but important change: a willingness to embrace something common in the city, apartments above stores. In the village of Farmingdale will move from one-story retail to two-story retail-plus-housing. “We don’t have to freak people out with seven-, eight-, ten-, 15-story plans,” he said.

What a difference a suburb makes. In Brooklyn, of course, Forest City Ratner offered fictional 15-story buildings at Atlantic Yards to distract people from the real heights.

“We have to engage the citizenry,” Alexander added. “It’s sometimes ornery, difficult, challenging, [but] they have to own these and say, ‘Hey, this is my plan.’”

To move forward, he said, planners must “educate the community on density,” must have incentives for development (such as credits to clean up brownfields), and must engage the community.

The recommendations sounded more like an endorsement of ULURP, the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, rather than the fast-track process used by the Empire State Development Corporation for Atlantic Yards.

Schematics necessary

Robert Lane of the Regional Plan Association advised that, besides town hall meetings, charettes, and other public meetings, planners must offer photo simulations of projects so the public can evaluate what’s on the table. It was a reminder to me that most press outlets have ignored simulations of the scale of Atlantic Yards, such as this from the Environmental Simulation Center for the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods.

He encouraged planners to find the intersection of transit-agency priorities, community-based goals and objectives, and technical constraints. (For AY, add to that political influences, such as the desire for a sports team, or a developer's history in the borough.) “If you’re honest with people, they will help you get there.”

“Only time is the true indicator” of whether TOD works, said Joseph Chan of the MTA.

Queens coming?

Elisa Picca of the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) observed that LIRR access to Grand Central, by 2013, could have an enormous influence, cutting commuter time to the East Side of Manhattan and also leading to further development along the line. (Does that boost Sunnyside Yards as an option for the Nets?)

NYC Transit's Gould had no slideshow--he gestured out the window at the SoHo neighborhood. “You’re looking at a landscape that’s TOD,” he said, citing contiguous neighborhoods, narrow streets to slow traffic, high transit use, and a walkable design with “zero setback on buildings” away from the sidewalk.

He cited some promising TODs in New York: the Arverne development in Far Rockaway; the new Stillwell Avenue terminal, “designed in part to jump-start redevelopment in Coney Island”--a location, of course, that some have pushed for a Brooklyn arena--and the extension of the 7 subway line, “which makes it possible to develop the West Side.”

The assumption, Gould said, is “that you must provide capacity.” That raises questions in the Atlantic Yards context, as experts examining the issue for the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods have challenged the state's assumption that there is sufficient capacity for the planning project.

“We should keep an eye on each development and try to bring it to the highest quality of transit-oriented standards,” Gould concluded. And that’s what stimulated Orcutt’s comment about Atlantic Yards.

Gould responded that the MTA had the technical chops to analyze the use of platforms and stairs, and to run trains to deal with crowd surges. In the larger picture, he acknowledged, “virtually all these developments go through the policy and political structure. We technicians participate in that structure.”


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…