Two legal experts, while not expressing support for the Atlantic Yards project, nevertheless said at a panel discussion last Wednesday at Yeshiva University’s Cardozo School of Law that they thought the pending eminent domain challenge would fail in a federal appellate court, given current legal doctrine. The court will dismiss the suit, as did the trial court judge, they said, because of the presence of some public benefits, and because judges are loath to set a precedent in which courts investigate the motives of decision-makers. The predictions by Cardozo law professor Stewart Sterk and University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein generated a forceful response from the third panelist, New York attorney Matthew Brinckerhoff , who represents the plaintiffs in Goldstein v. Pataki and argued the appeal, before an engaged but skeptical panel , on October 9. Brinckerhoff (right) stressed that eminent domain doctrine seems to be evolving. If the Supreme Court opened up the possib...
This watchdog blog, by journalist Norman Oder, covers the project to build the Barclays Center arena and 15-16 towers at a crucial site in Brooklyn. Dubbed Atlantic Yards by developer Forest City Ratner in 2003, it was rebranded Pacific Park Brooklyn in 2014 after Shanghai-based Greenland USA took a majority share. Forest City left in 2018. Eight towers and the arena have been built. After a stall, Cirrus and LCOR in 2025 took over as master developers. A plan to complete the project is pending.