Skip to main content

Brooklyn Tomorrow: synergy and puffery

It's a document for our times, a promotional magazine inserted in yesterday’s New York Post, not labeled advertorial though it certainly reads as such. Brooklyn Tomorrow is subtitled “The changing face of the bustling borough’s dynamic communities,” and features advertising and cheery articles mainly about major development projects.

Produced by the Post’s Community Newspaper Group, and written by staffers from the Courier-Life chain the Post purchased, Brooklyn Tomorrow reads like the return of Forest City Ratner's promotional Brooklyn Standard, but under the imprimatur of an actual newspaper rather than as a “publication.”

And, of course, FCR's Atlantic Yards project gets royal treatment. The cover boasts a full-frontal close-up of Frank Gehry’s Miss Brooklyn, which could be described as "massive" or perhaps "striking," rather than “elegant," as stated. On the back cover, another view of Miss Brooklyn, in the Barclays Center advertisement that first appeared in January.

On the inside back cover, another advertisement for the Barclays Center. On the inside front cover, a Forest City Ratner advertisement, stating, “What will Atlantic Yards bring to Brooklyn?” The lead article declares Atlantic Yards “the crown jewel of Brooklyn’s renaissance.”

Looking more closely

The Atlantic Yards advertisement must have been produced a while back, since it promises “6900 units of mixed-income housing,” while, after a trim, the project would include only 6430 units. It promises 15,000 union construction jobs, though of course that’s job-years, meaning 1500 jobs a year over ten years (or fewer annual jobs if the project takes longer, as is likely).

And it promises “a historic, legally binding community benefits agreement ratified by 200 leaders and organizations.” Of course CBAs, especially the Atlantic Yards one, have come in for criticism from many quarters, and the “ratification,” as the New York Observer reported, was a big stretch.

Overview article

Reporter Stephen Witt, whose coverage is often sympathetic to Atlantic Yards, outdoes himself in an overview article that declares Atlantic Yards "the new heart of Brooklyn." It fails to mention that this is the most controversial development in the borough and the subject of several lawsuits, among other challenges.

Witt also offers some revisionist history:
The genesis of the Atlantic Yards project began in 2004 after Forest City Ratner Comoanies led an investment team that successfully bid for the New Jersey Nets with the goal of moving the team to Brooklyn for the 2009-2010 season.

Um, the project was officially announced on 12/10/03 and had been in the works for far longer. As Chris Smith reported last August in New York magazine:
While there was no public hint of Ratner’s interest in either the Nets or the Brooklyn rail-yards site until late July 2003, the developer had been meeting with Bloomberg nearly a year before that, according to Dan Doctoroff, the city’s economic-development czar.

Witt continues:
With this goal in mind, Ratner began looking at sites. He settled on the MTA/LIRR Vanderbilt Yards at the intersection of Atlantic and Flatbush avenues, once sought for a new Dodger Stadium before the ball club went west.

While property near that intersection was sought for a new stadium, the railyards themselves were not. And Ratner had been looking at the site for much, much longer.

Moreover, the developer knew he couldn’t confine his plans just to the railyards, since an arena wouldn’t fit. Witt explains the expansion using Ratnerian language:
The project footprint eventually included the rail yard site along with a remainder of property comprising empty lots, gas stations, auto repair shops, underutilized or vacant industrial and manufacturing buildings and some residential buildings.
(Emphasis added)

Or, perhaps, "a great piece of real estate" (in the words of Forest City Enterprises' Chuck Ratner) awaiting a rezoning that never occurred. The article repeats the $5.6 billion lie and claims a net positive fiscal impact of $1.3 billion.

Bruce speaks

The article does include a quote from FCR CEO Bruce Ratner, who declares, "We are proud to be part of both our borough's past and its future, as we are proud to support Mayor Bloomberg as he prepares us for 2030."

While wags might suggest that 2030 indicates the likely conclusion of the claimed ten-year buildout, 2030 is Bloomberg's sustainability deadline. Forest City Ratner almost surely supports Bloomberg's congestion pricing plan, since it would reduce gridlock already present in and around Downtown Brooklyn before the planned arena is built.

On the other hand, a look at Bloomberg's PlaNYC suggests no endorsement for the process behind Atlantic Yards.

Coney confusion

Perhaps more entertaining is Witt’s article on Coney Island redevelopment, which admiringly describes the condo+timeshare+entertainment complex proposed by Thor Equities’ Joe Sitt, then acknowledges that the plan “does have its critics."

Who? Those who fear Sitt won’t build the amusements he promises and “preservationists” who say that residential development would destroy Coney’s character. Unmentioned is that Amanda Burden, chairperson of the City Planning Commission, has flatly declared that “amusements are incompatible with immediately adjacent residential use.”

Advertising lineup

The advertising in Brooklyn Tomorrow heavily skews to real estate developments, including ones in and around downtown and on the fringes of Williamsburg. Also advertising are several hospitals and banks that likely have longstanding relationship with the Courier-Life chain.

Full-page advertisers include:
--Maimonides Medical Center
--Toll Brothers City Living (three projects)
--Long Island College Hospital of Brooklyn
--Belltel Lofts
--Forte Condominiums
--One Hanson Place
--Forest City Ratner Companies
--Prudential Douglas Ellman Real Eastate
--Abigail Kirsch Caterers
--New York Methodist Hospital
--Marine Florists
--L Lofts
--Number 20 Bayard
--New York School of Career and Applied Studies
--Waste Management
--Valley National Bank
--Marine Park Luxury Rentals
--Ridgewood Savings Bank
--110 Livingston condos
--Capital Paint & Decorating
--Amex/Heart of Brooklyn
--Kings Plaza Diner

--The Brooklyn Hospital Center
--R&H Realty & Home Sales
--Aria condos
--Oro condos
--Cosmetic & Laser Center of Bay Ridge
--Pedulla Ceramic Tile
--United Homes
--Metropolitan Paper Recycling
--Atlantic Design Center
--The Maids Home Services
--Deno’s Wonder Wheel


  1. I was trying to read this over someone's shoulder on the subway, but it looked like Atlantic Yards project was identified as part of downtown Brooklyn.

  2. Yes, the headline says "Changing the tide downtown."

    I've written about the issue:


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…