Competence and transparency: when developer fails to disclose additional time for after-hours work, state authority ESD should catch that.
See the screenshot at right for the variance, from the Department of Buildings (DOB), and the one below for the excerpt from the bi-weekly Construction Update, which is prepared by the developers and then circulated, apparently without vetting, by Empire State Development (ESD), the state authority that oversees/shepherds the project.
It's a small difference, but not unimportant. And they know better, because I've pointed it out.
(The developer of the site is TF Cornerstone.)
Why it matters
Let's recall the words of former ESD official Arana Hankin, who became more critical of the project she'd overseen after she left state government for a fellowship at Harvard (as I reported in 2016):
Policies that have dictated megaprojects have contributed to the widening economic gap in New York, speeding up the impacts of gentrification, displacing residents and local businesses, and supporting the growth of big business. Development in New York has a multitude of complexities. To be truly successful, policies will require a more holistic perspective that includes all of its citizens. New Yorkers should demand more of their government.
Sure, New Yorkers should demand more of their government. But before gaining better big-picture policies, could we at least get basic competence and transparency? It shouldn't be so hard.
Comments
Post a Comment