Skip to main content

Would JJ like AY? An exhaustive "no"

Would Jane Jacobs approve of Atlantic Yards? I've written before about how the planners behind the project certainly were not unmindful of the Jacobsian qualities for a healthy city, but the project really wouldn't qualify. And I also wrote about the AY angle regarding the Jane Jacobs exhibit.

Now urban planner and lawyer Michael D.D. White ups the ante, with an essay and chart in the Brooklyn Paper concluding that AY would be very, very not Jacobsian.


  1. Here are all 47 Criteria that were used to examine the project:

    47 Criteria used and findings- (full analysis availble)
    1. Avoidance of Regimentation? NO:
    2. Avoidance of Monopolistic Centers of Real Estate? NO:
    3. Avoidance of Monotony? NO:
    4. Appropriate Density? NO:
    5. Uses Parks as Focal Points? NO:
    6. Has Intricacy of Park Design? NO:
    7. Parks Are Designed with Desirable Centers? NO:
    8. Parks Are Designed So Sun Shines Within Them? NO:
    9. Park Design Makes Use of “Enclosure” to Define Park Space? NO:
    10. Building Creates Close-grained Weave of City Fabric? NO:
    11. Project Will Be Developed Gradually Working with City Fabric? NO:
    12. Avoidance of Projects Being Apart from Weave of City Fabric? NO:
    13. Project Participates in City Fluidity? NO:
    14. Project Creates Population Diversity? NO:
    15. Project Has Building Age Diversity with a Close-Grained Mingling? NO:
    16. Will There Be a Concentrated Diversity of Use? MAYBE NOT:
    17. Avoidance of Harmful Parking Lots? NO:
    18. Improved Mass Transit Bus Service by Avoidance of One-Way Streets? MAYBE NOT:
    19. Avoidance of Harmful Large and Heavy Trucking Depots? MAYBE NOT?:
    20. Avoidance of Harmful Gas Stations? MAYBE YES/MAYBE NO:
    21. Avoidance of Harmful Gigantic Outdoor Advertising? NO:
    22. Avoidance of Enterprises and Uses Harmful Because the Scale Is Wrong? NO:
    23. Protection Against Self-Destruction of Diversity of Building Use? NO:
    24. Avoidance of “Border Vacuums?” NO:
    25. Convert Borders to Seams? NO:
    26. Allowing People to Move up the Ladder Through “Unslumming”? NO:
    27. Use of Empiricism and Curiosity to Determine and Work with Actual Facts and Reality? NO:
    28. Observes the Goal of Creating Political Access (Including the Goal of Countering Public Money Expenditures)? NO:
    29. Using Public Participation in Shaping Cities? NO:
    30. Avoidance of Cataclysmic Money? NO:
    31. Making Good Use of Gradual Money? NO:
    32. Is Eminent Domain Being Used in a Way That the Full Cost of it Is Reckoned and Paid For? NO:
    33. Is Eminent Domain Being Used with Restraint? NO:
    34. Is Eminent Domain and its Threat Being Used Only with Full and Proper Public Comprehension? NO:
    35. Is Eminent Domain for Greed Being Avoided? NO:
    36. Best Way to Subsidize Dwellings? NO:
    37. Avoidance of Surges of People in Limited Time Frames? NO:
    38. Does Project Represent Healthy Decentralization and City Economics? NO:
    39. Keeping Blocks Short and Creating Extra Streets to Help Do So? NO:
    40. Avoidance of Superblocks? NO:
    41. Efforts to Use Sidewalks Well? NO:
    42. Creating Visual Closures with Bends and Irregularities in Street Grid? NO:
    43. Use of Landmarks: (Which Are Not Necessarily Created by Size)? PROBABLY NO:
    44. Going Beyond Appearance and Pretty Pictures to Actual Function? NO:
    45. Keeping Artificial Architectural Exhibitionism at Bay? NO:
    46. Does the Project Involve Good Deployment of Available Resources? NO:
    47. Building Buildings that relate to the streets and sidewalks with stoops and windows creating a system of “eyes”and participation in a “ballet” of the streets based interest and a weave of trusting relationship? N/A?:

  2. The entire Report Card is 23 pages of material. The lead-in to the report in addition to the 47 criteria is as follows:


    The following is a Jane Jacobs evaluation report card of the Atlantic Yards project. All of the criteria for the report card have been distilled from Jane Jacobs book “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” (1961). Some of the criteria involves overlaps which is quite natural since Jane Jacobs saw city systems as intricate relationships and interconnections affecting and sometimes generating each other, analogous in certain ways to human physiology and biology. Though some arguably imply or result in the others, I have broken down as many discrete principles as possible. I have not given comparative weight to the principles but since the project scores badly across the board this does not make a difference in coming to an overall assessment. Jane Jacobs herself highlighted four main criteria (p.150, 151) which are very well known. They are all represented below and most guidance she offers is somehow related to them, but the report card does not confine itself to just those four broad principles. By extracting and using all 47 identified standards, the report card tests more deeply and more completely. It also winds up applying what are often principles Jane Jacobs integrated from other thinkers who had thought competently about the same problems she was addressing.

    The four main principles Jane Jacobs herself identified as the most important points this book her book had to make are (in summary) that:

    • There should be mixed uses and functions that ensure that people are using the outdoors on different schedules and, as much as possible, are using facilities available in common.

    • Most blocks should be short and streets and opportunities to turn frequent.

    • There should be a good close-grained mingling of buildings that vary in age and condition, including a good proportion of old ones.

    • There should be a sufficiently dense concentration of people which should include people who are present because of residence.

    This report card rates Atlantic Yards almost entirely negatively by these Jane Jacobs criteria. It could be that I failed to extract some criteria within Jane Jacobs book that would yield a few positive assessments I missed. Arguably, I failed to apply some of these criteria as favorable to the project as I could or should. I don’t think either of these things is the case but people are free to raise specific quibbles. It is also possible that some of the standards Jane Jacobs suggests be followed arguably don’t make sense. Some have sought to “debunk” Jane Jacobs, but today her teachings and those of William H. Whyte are ingrained in the work of mainstream firms like Beyer Blinder Belle, the architectural firm which did the recent restoration work of Grand Central Station.

    There is also the question of whether Jane Jacobs’ ideas should be treated as any form of “gospel” something she herself would have questioned, though she would have readily endorsed the use of her ideas by those endeavoring to see for themselves and use common sense to reach their own conclusions. Based on things Jane Jacobs said about herself in life I was tempted to add a standard (in line with her constant empirical questioning) that people, including Ms. Jacobs should regard themselves as fallible and capable of mistakes. People need to know they are not God. Were this added as criteria #48 the project would not score well on it. Jane Jacobs knew that big plans tend to lead to big mistakes. It is far from clear that the megadeveloper of the Atlantic yards project adequately comprehends his mistakes or ability to make them. In the face of this, Jane Jacobs, although believing in her own fallibility, was famous for being right when the too many others had gotten it wrong.

    If this report card is only so much as just mostly correct, then this megadevelopment, shiny, new and expensive, can be expected to have a severely blighting effect on Brooklyn and city in which it is located. What it does and doesn’t do should be measured against the much better alternatives open to us.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …