tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20743459.post2652138705516356805..comments2024-03-18T05:56:29.009-04:00Comments on Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Report: Eminent domain case is dismissed unanimously; appeal in this and EIS case remain as last legal hurdlesNorman Oderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07618087999719667586noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20743459.post-36944587221649391252009-05-15T14:53:00.000-04:002009-05-15T14:53:00.000-04:00As we all know, there's a constitutional process ...As we all know, there's a constitutional process for changing the constitution called "amendments". <br /><br />Apparently, that process is far too cumbersome and problematic for the politicians in black robes, as well as for the politicians who appoint them.<br /><br />The u.s. is rapidly turning into a glorified banana republic, with no end in sight.CRUZ COUNTRYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09387134609817547810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20743459.post-89560934105354866512009-05-15T14:09:00.000-04:002009-05-15T14:09:00.000-04:00As gideon kanner (law professor & eminent doma...As gideon kanner (law professor & eminent domain expert) said, "new york is a sewer when it comes to the abuse of the power of eminent domain for favored private interest."<br /><br />And as i've said before, the supreme court of the united states (see 5-4 ruling in 'kelo vs city of new london') is a sewer when it comes to abusing the written word of our nation's founding fathers.<br /><br />"For public use" means "for public use", NOT for private use. It's that simple. <br /><br />If the founders had meant "for public purpose" they would have said "for public purpose". It's that simple. <br /><br />Yet apparently, it's not that simple for the politicians in black robes who insist on rewriting the constitution every chance they get.CRUZ COUNTRYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09387134609817547810noreply@blogger.com