Skip to main content

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park in 2017: watching the residential rollout, Site 5 plans, timetable uncertainty; what's the (inevitable) surprise?

Yesterday, I published my 2016 round-up of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park news. Now, some things to look for and to expect--and some speculation about the inevitable 2017 "surprise."

More towers will open in 2017, that's for sure. On top of the 50/50 rental 461 Dean, which opened (slightly) in 2016 and is slowly taking in tenants, two buildings--the "100% affordable" rental 535 Carlton, and the 550 Vanderbilt condo--are sure to open in 2017, while the other ("100% affordable" rental 38 Sixth) is expected to open. That's still just 4 of 15 (or 16) total towers.

The question, however, is how fast they will lease up and sell, and how fast the Temporary Certificates of Occupancy will turn into final versions.

We've already seen delays in all the buildings, rendering previous tentative schedules even more unreliable. Market-rate leases for 461 Dean have faced price drops, given the current glut of luxury units, which may make it tougher to lease the most expensive units at 535 Carlton.

Will new residents be happy with brand new apartments? Surely, but will others feel frustrated by the absence of the promised "eight-acre park," and by continued construction?

Some retailers and landlords on Flatbush and Vanderbilt avenues will be pleased by new consumers. New places to eat and drink, some yet to open, have made business plans--and paid higher rents--based on such expectations.

What's next?

The full project timetable remains uncertain, given the pause in market-rate development announced in November. Can the affordable housing really be built by 2025, as promised, if the whole project will take much longer? Will the affordability of the housing improve? Those questions linger.

Three sites have been put up for sale by Greenland Forest City Partners (or are seeking investors): the condo sites at B12 and B13, for which the market is likely glutted in the near term, and the site at B4, which Greenland Forest City Partners wants to swap to office space. It seems unlikely that an investment in B4, at least, would be announced before the public process began.

In 2017, likely the process to built B15 (aka 664 Pacific), the market-rate building with a school, will begin, though that middle school is not likely to appear until 2021.

A bit question surrounds Site 5, now how to Modell's and P.C. Richard, where a legal case involving the latter likely will be resolved. That will allow a public process, involving hearings and a pro forma vote, to move a huge amount of bulk once planned for B1--now home to the arena plaza--across the street to a site once thought to support 440,000 square feet, not 1.1 million.

That might bring out some longtime Atlantic Yards combatants, but the battles these days are surely less pitched. GFCP was planning not just office spaces but condos and glitzy retail. If they secure--at least tentatively--an anchor tenant, the project might get some momentum. But the effrontery of building such a massive project at that site also might galvanize opposition.

Sports questions

The Brooklyn Nets are in a rebuilding year, and must figure out how to bring people into the building. So far, it hasn't been stellar. The New York Islanders also have had a disappointing season, though attendance (and performance) last year improved during the season.

I don't think the Islanders can seriously pursue an opt-out of their lease, given the cost of a new arena, but wouldn't be surprised if that opt-out is used to force improvements in the deal between the team and the Barclays Center operators. For example, might the arena be pushed to retrofit its balky ice system, which beat writers say does not meet NHL standards?

Politics and accountability

Will Mayor Bill de Blasio, pursuing re-election, staunchly defend and praise Atlantic Yards affordable housing? He just might, and only challengers who do their homework can plausibly criticize him for it being not so affordable.

But de Blasio likely won't face a serious challenge, unless he's wounded by indictments of his staff, or even himself. Otherwise proven citywide vote-getter like Comptroller Scott Stringer or Public Advocate Tish James, or high-profile officials like Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, will stay away, leaving fringe candidates like Tony Avella.

I don't expect Atlantic Yards will be an issue in the 35th Council District, since no one has yet emerged as a challenger to incumbent Council Member Laurie Cumbo. (Update: there are rumors that 2013 challenger Ede Fox may run again.) In the state legislature, Assemblymember Walter Mosley has raised some concerns and questions, joined by fellow legislators, but has not yet followed up with concrete action like a hearing.

For the project, it's tough to expect much more accountability. The long-promised Independent Compliance Monitor for the Community Benefits Agreement has never arrived. Empire State Development, the state authority that oversees/shepherds the project, is on its fourth Project Director, with diminishing institutional knowledge.

The Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation (AY CDC), the board set up in 2014 (but which first met in 2015) to advise on the project, has sometimes added elements of transparency, but has been mostly toothless.

What's the surprise?

What could be the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park "surprise" in 2017? (There's almost always a surprise.)

One surprise could be the announcement of a new timetable, faster or slower than now assumed. Another could be new investors in three towers. But those are "expected" announcements.

Another might be the reinstatement of 421-a, or a similar tax break, which could re-start residential development. And perhaps there might be federal lobbying for infrastructure (or other) funds from a Trump administration. Maybe there might be another (fourth) round of EB-5 fundraising, assuming the law involving regional centers (the middlemen) is renewed.

More dramatic would be a sale of larger portions of the property, and a new player in the Greenland Forest City equation.

Another surprise might be reconfiguration of city services to better accommodate the emerging project, which spans three Community Districts.

Another surprise could be--just guessing, no evidence--tensions between Forest City and Greenland. Their collaboration, to outside observers, seems productive, but Greenland is no longer as deep-pocketed as it once was, so it may look at spending differently.

After all, Forest City and Skanska were once happy partners in the modular factory, and now they're battling in court over cost overruns on the B2 (aka 461 Dean) building.

Above all, however, the surprise might be something that hasn't yet been floated publicly. Stay tuned.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.