Skip to main content

FCR says "overall schedule is fixed," but when will project be done: 2025? 2032? 2035?

Now that Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park faces unspecified delays, confessed earlier this month by Forest City Ratner's (FCR) parent Forest City Realty Trust (FCRT), when will the project get done? We don't know.

A Bloomberg article 11/17/16 about how FCR's market-rate rentals at 461 Dean face significant competition noted that parent Forest City Realty Trust took an accounting loss on the delayed Pacific Park project:
"We remain committed to bringing the entire project to completion, but there are a number of existing and near-term market factors that we must consider,” MaryAnne Gilmartin, CEO of Forest City Ratner, said in an e-mailed statement. Those include the new development supply, rising labor costs and the resolution of issues surrounding a New York affordable housing program, she said.
While the overall schedule is fixed, and we will meet it, there is flexibility in terms of individual buildings, especially given the amount of work underway,” she said.
(Emphasis added)

That is the same line that Gilmartin deputy Ashley Cotton used at a meeting last week. But she would not provide a specific timetable.

So we don't know what the overall schedule is.

Looking more closely: 2025? 2035?

Cotton also said that "the Greenland Forest City joint venture is fully committed to Pacific Park and our obligations under our government agreements," which means a new permanent railyard, a deck, and a May 2025 deadline for the project's affordable units, about 1,470 (out of 2,250) of which remain to be built. 

That deadline comes with $2,000/month fines for each unit not built--that's $1 million per month if there are 500 units outstanding--though that could be delayed if they invoke lack of subsidies. (Or, perhaps, there could be another renegotiation. After all, Atlantic Yards is a "never say never" project.) 

But even if the joint venture does build the 2,250 below-market units by 2025, that doesn't mean they have to finish all the commensurate 2,250 market-rate rentals and 1,930 condos (200 of which are supposed to be below-market) by then.

CFO Bob O'Brien of parent Forest City Realty Trust said in an 11/4/16 conference call with investment analysts that the firm's financial model "extends to 2035, 20 years from now."

As I wrote, that doesn't necessarily mean project completion by 2035, but it's a pretty strong clue that the project won't be finished by 2025.

The 2035 date may represent stabilization of income, but presumably that's two-to-five years after which the final building is constructed. 

The developer does have until 2035 before it defaults and would lose the right to develop the project.

Why 2032 might make sense

Another important date is June 1, 2030, which is when the last of 15 annual payments of about $11 million for Vanderbilt Yard development rights is due to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

According to the 6/22/09 MTA staff summary, when Forest City Ratner renegotiated its deal to buy those development rights, the payments have an implied interest rate of 6.5%, a gentle figure. That offers reason for the developer to wait, as long as other factors, including subsidies and the cost of construction, remain challenging.

From MTA Staff Summary
There is incentive to speed up payments: only such payments unlock each development parcel. But if they wait until June 1, 2030 to make that final payment, then start construction of the final tower, that suggests project completion no earlier than 2032.

It's all more complicated, though, since it's likely that market-rate and affordable units will be combined in several buildings, and the market for the former--currently tight--will fluctuate. If Forest City must meet that 2025 affordable housing deadline, then a good number of market-rate units must be built by then.

More details on plan for railyard development space

The 2014 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Project Description, lays out the process:
• An FCRC affiliate is granted the right “from time to time” until June 1, 2031 [sic] to purchase any of the Air Space Subparcels, subject to certain conditions. One such condition is that FCRC has constructed the new LIRR rail yard in accordance with the Yard Relocation and Construction Agreement (which is discussed below).
• At the closing of such Air Space Subparcel, MTA is to deliver fee title to such Subparcel to a specified FCRC affiliate or its designee. It is anticipated that ESDC will be the designee, and will simultaneously lease such Air Space Subparcel to an affiliate of FCRC. The FCRC affiliate that has so acquired the Air Space Subparcel for the Project is granted the right to convey its rights in such Air Space Subparcel to another entity (such as a third-party developer) subject to certain conditions.
• The MTA may terminate FCRC’s right to acquire the Air Space Parcel if the new LIRR rail yard is not completed by 90 days after September 1, 2016, subject to certain extensions and payment of per diem fees.
Note that the June 1, 2031 date should be a year earlier, as far as I can tell. Also note that the deadline for the railyard has been extended to Dec. 1, 2017, and could be extended again.

Also from that Project Description:
• FCRC is obligated to have substantially completed construction of the entire platform within 25 years from the “Project Effective Date” (i.e., May 12, 2035), subject to specified force majeure and other provisions.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.