Skip to main content

In exit interview, DBP leader Reed insists luxury housing helps affordability

There were a couple of interesting nuggets in NY1 Online: Former President of Downtown Brooklyn Talks Future of Borough, posted 8/11/16, summarized as "Tucker Reed, the former president of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, discussed the redevelopment of downtown Brooklyn and the future of the borough with Errol Louis."

Trickle-down affordability?


"All of this growth necessitates a conversation about, and a real commitment to, infrastructure. The original plan for Downtown Brooklyn was for office space, we ended up with residential," he said. "It's been very helpful for the borough, because it helps keep affordable--all that supply means that other parts of Brooklyn won't become unaffordable as new residents are given the option of living in Downtown Brooklyn. But you need new schools. You need additional sanitation service. You need more open space."

Host Louis was skeptical: "You're suggesting that the building of market-rate, or even luxury housing Downtown, brand-new housing, might sort of halt gentrification right there at the waterfront , and prevent it from spreading further out. That of course is not really the experience of most people watching."

"Look, the conversation about affordability in the city, and it's great to have one, and we've been suffering from a housing crisis for decades," Reed responded, "and this administration, Mayor de Blasio has been very active in tackling it head on, as was his predecessor Mayor Bloomberg [who whiffed on affordability in the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning--ed.]. But it's simple supply and demand.  [Isn't a whole lot more supply needed to move the needle?] And often this conversation becomes very complicated, because people have strong feelings, 'cause it impacts their lives, and it impacts the quality of their life. But the answer to the affordability question is that we need more  housing period. We need more luxury housing, we need more mid-market housing, we need more affordable housing."

He went on to tout the transit infrastructure in Downtown Brooklyn and then the mayor's proposed BQX streetcar (backed, by the way, by developers in the DBP as well as Reed's old employer, Two Trees).

He also suggested that institutions of higher education in Downtown Brooklyn might monetize their real estate and build "additional student housing, space for programs," following NYU's formula in Manhattan.

Back to luxury housing

At about 8:22, Louis cited the advent of needle-like buildings. "Normally, I think--because I remember what it was like before, 'Hey full speed ahead, develop whatever you can develop, so it doesn't look like, y'know, the old Albee Square mall.'... Does the future have to be a 1000-story spire [surely he meant 100-story] for luxury residents..."? 

"Look, does it have to be for luxury residential?" Reed responded. "No. it should be a mix of uses. But my humble opinion.. we should not be afraid of embracing the 21st-century city, and that means density, and that means height, and that means place where you have the transit infrastructure."

Sounds like his embrace of the "iconic" office building proposed for Site 5 of Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park.

"We need to be building four or five of those [residential towers] every month just to keep pace with what's coming," he said, citing the demand for housing. Well, that's if luxury housing is the solution to a seemingly intractable problem.

Louis asked if the developers were on board, "betting on an endless supply of wealthy people?"

"The reality is the vast majority of product being built in Downtown Brooklyn is not luxury housing, it's rental," responded Reed, setting a rather fine distinction between luxury condos and market-rate rentals. "Many of them have affordable components. So we don't really have a deep luxury condo market yet."

What next?

What's Reed doing next? 

"I'm going to do a little of my own thing now," he said, "working with a company called Hello Alfred, which is working on a personal assistant service to bring to the masses," for the millenial generation.

"And I'll start thinking about some of my own development projects," he continued. "Affordability is something that --I'll always be a public sector guy in my heart, and affordability matters to me. So affordable housing projects, and really looking the opportunity for more office creation in Brooklyn
I think there's a ton of pent-up demand that's not being met now. And I'd like to figure ways in the private sector to be part of the solution."

Based on the path of his predecessor, Joe Chan, Reed could go to Empire State Development, the state authority that oversees/shepherds Atlantic Yards. Or if he's working on office creation, perhaps he'll intersect some day with the Site 5 project.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…