Skip to main content

Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch calls Atlantic Yards--de Blasio, Clinton, Ratner--example of "New Tammany Hall" (But Republicans were responsible too)


OK, what to think of this press release, Judicial Watch Investigation Ties Clinton, De Blasio, Billionaire Developer Ratner to ‘New Tammany Hall’ Scandal, from a conservative watchdog group?

Well, given that the "incisive new expose" gathers much evidence critical of Atlantic Yards, and quotes me several times, I say it goes part of the way to describing what I call the Culture of Cheating.

But it breaks no new investigatory ground, and it's ridiculous to suggest that Mayor Bill de Blasio and Forest City Ratner tenant (and potential President) Hillary Clinton form a Tammany Hall triumvirate.

That's too bad, since I suspect most Judicial Watch followers--from the nearly 400 comments on Facebook, more than 4,000 shares, and some 6,000 likes--are Clinton opponents, with many of them fans of rival Donald Trump.

See, Trump has worked the system for decades too, and richly deserves the description from journalist Wayne Barrett as a "state capitalist." Ratner deserves it too.

Ratner has worked cordially with--and contributed to--elected officials across the spectrum, including Republican governor George Pataki and (nominal) Republican Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who first gave Atlantic Yards their blessing. Ratner was close with Republican Mayor Rudy Giuliani and for years has employed former Republican Sen. Alfonse D'Amato as a lobbyist.

So such accusations could have been made years ago, featuring different protagonists. The scandal--or business as usual--in New York is dismayingly bipartisan.

No new ground broken, but maybe in the future

The report breaks no new ground, other than in (strained) interpretation, though it's valuable to see outsiders outraged at the routine operations of the three men-in-a-room Public Authorities Control Board, part of the New York landscape, or--as I've pointed out--how the Shanghai government-owned Greenland Holdings now reaps the benefit of taxpayer assistance.

And despite the reference to "the Age of Corruption," the report acknowledges that no illegality has been found. (Unmentioned is the violation of state environmental law, which let to a new review.)

But some new information might surface, if Judicial Watch can pry open some emails from de Blasio and his "agents of the city," including advisor Jonathan Rosen, whose firm BerlinRosen also works for Forest City. (Ratner, unsurprisingly, wouldn't answer Judicial Watch's questions.)

“Micah Morrison’s bold expose of apparent massive corruption at the highest levels of government in America’s largest city should outrage all who are appalled by political pay-for-play schemes,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in the press release. “That’s why Judicial Watch is demanding records from the mayor’s office for the timely production of materials relating to this controversy. We will take it to court if necessary, because the public has a right to know.”

About Judicial Watch

Here's Judicial Watch's description of itself as "a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law," and here's Media Matters' critique.

Here's the latest Clinton email scandal, leveraged by Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit,  and Media Matters' critique.

Assessing Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park

The report, The New Tammany Hall: New York in the Age of Corruption, sets out some questions:
For over a decade, Atlantic Yards has been at the center of heated disputes over power, profit and privilege in New York. Does the site serve the needs of the taxpayers who financed its development? Or is it primarily a giant boondoggle generating torrents of cash for well-connected insiders?
It's even more murky. Taxpayers have provided many advantages to the development, including tax breaks, below-market land, the use of eminent domain, and an override of zoning, though in most cases that's not direct financing.

And, curiously enough, while much evidence suggests government power serves the developer above all, the sales of the Nets (at least the first sale of 80% of the team), the arena holding company, and 70% of the project (minus the arena and B2) came from weakness more than strength. In other words, had Ratner's parent company had more patience, they might have earned far more returns.

In other words, Ratner may have worked the system, and failed to deliver on promises, but failed (so far) to generate the torrents of cash once imagined.

"Honest graft"

Morrison writes:
But the central scam of the new Tammany system would not be unfamiliar to old Tammany’s Plunkitt: public money for private profit. Plunkitt called it “honest graft”—gaming the system to the benefit of the powerful and well-connected, with crumbs for the common folk.
That's hard to dispute--but not uncommon with real estate projects needing special approval. (See for example the Rivington House scandal.)

I'd contend that the "honest graft" with Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park pushes the envelope in several ways, forming a tapestry of sketchy behavior. But until there's a smoking gun, it can only be called "corruption" in the colloquial sense.

Among the issues raised in the report:
  • the role of the PACB
  • ties to corrupt Sheldon Silver and Willy Rapfogel
  • the corruption cases involving Richard Lipsky and Carl Kruger
  • the corruption cases involving Forest City's Ridge Hill project in Yonkers
  • the use of eminent domain (but no mention of bogus blight)
  • the sale to Shanghai-based Greenland Holdings
  • the unaffordability of many "affordable" apartments
  • the use of the sketchy EB-5 visa program
  • the oversold promise of jobs
There's much missing, given the understandably limited space, including, among other things, the finding of blight in a gentrifying neighborhood and the inside track with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Also unmentioned--in relation to this project, at least--is the key governmental official today, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who controls the state authority, Empire State Development, that oversees/shepherds the project.

Toward the future

I'm not sure Hillary Clinton qualifies as a Ratner friend, rather than a tenant and associate, but Morrison's speculation that "Knowing her will be helpful when all those federal office space leases come up" shouldn't be dismissed. Surely the landlord for her campaign will get someone to return his calls.

The report ends with the suggestion that U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara might crush the new Tammany system. Maybe, and he's certainly pursued several important elected officials, including former Assembly Speaker Silver and former Senate President Dean Skelos.

But Bharara chose not to go after--or even mention--Forest City regarding Ridge Hill, or any other case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.