Skip to main content

The Nets, fandom, and being "too busy" to miss the old Brooklyn (and what about the felonious Barclays?)

The nature and up-down intensity of Brooklyn Nets fandom has been the subject of much discussion, as noted 5/1/14 on NetsDaily:
In a tweet from their own account, the Nets disassociated themselves from Lenn Robbins tweet of Thursday night in which the team's in-house beat writer advised Nets fans to "set your DVD and take notes" on the Raptors home crowd, noting "this is what a playoff crowd sounds like."
Robbins later apologized, and Nets fans in a subsequent game were reportedly quite loud.

Fandom in Brooklyn?

Then again, intense fandom has not exactly penetrated Brooklyn, however much Brooklyn Nets gear pops up around (and beyond) the borough. The night of that subsequent 2014 game, I wandered up Fulton Street and Lafayette Avenue just blocks from the arena. The game was on in most bars and restaurants, but only a fraction of people were watching attentively. 

A week earlier, I was in Pittsburgh, the day of a Penguins hockey playoff game. One main strip of bars and restaurants, East Carson Street, was inundated with people wearing Penguins gear. Every bar was advertising the game.

Pittsburgh is a small city, with a deep sports history. Brooklyn is a big borough, larger than most cities, with a new team and lots more things to do. 

So the Nets are not the Dodgers, the home team of an underdog borough in an era when baseball dominated sports fandom.

But it can't matter much to team owners and arena operators: they can draw fans from not just Brooklyn but the rest of the city and the nearby suburbs. The Brooklyn fan base is not as big a deal. And Brooklyn is big enough that some fraction of the borough can suffice as fans.

That was proven again in the past season, and it looks to be proven by the New York Islanders, which is rejiggering its fan base with Brooklyn and New York City fans.

The new fan base

The emergence of the Brooklyn fan base, and the new Brooklyn was the subject of David Roth's 5/2/14 SB Nation essay, THE HOME TEAM: TWO NOT-VERY-QUIET NIGHTS AT HOME WITH AN NBA TEAM THAT'S FIGURING OUT WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT WILL BE. As in the past, he was skeptical about the team's branding:
It is no slight to the team to note that this feels almost incidental in Barclays Center. The game experience is antiseptic and scrupulously leveraged. Various brands wink and blink and blurt and blunder up throughout the game, presenting things or simply being them.
...This is not unique to Brooklyn, of course; it was even more oppressive during the Nets' last years in New Jersey, when the team relied on marketing gimcrackery to wring revenue out of lousy teams playing in mostly empty arenas. But that is sort of the problem.
Becoming a home team

"It takes time to feel at home," wrote Roth, who recalled how 13 years earlier he found a skeevy apartment near Fifth Avenue and Dean Street, a block from the later arena site, at a time before Brooklyn got buzz, and a time when he willingly traveled to New Jersey for Nets games. Now there's "nothing else I would have recognized."

He suggested that fandom is emerging, that the "bars empty some before tip-off, but they were never quite full to begin with." But he thought the kids going to games will grow up into something more, and "Their cheers will be what drowns out the front office's relentless false-bottomed marketing language."

Maybe, maybe not if the team keeps flipping personnel, bringing on--for a high price--aging stars, then losing them to rebuild. The team this season will be significantly different from the one two years ago.

And I'm not so sure "the former O'Connor's is now a perfectly respectable place called McMahon's Public House." I know people who loved O'Connor's who now disdain McMahon's. But there are, yes, new people.

Time and change

Roth, who I respect as an eloquent writer, then strained:
There is nothing terribly natural or good about the variously underhanded and high-handed incidences of micro- and macro-scale corruption that brought the Barclays Center into being or brought the Nets to Brooklyn. All of that was terrible, and continues to be -- the slow and predictable revelation of all the various lies told casts a long shadow on the hopeful thing rising at Flatbush and Fifth. It is all business as usual, but that is never a compliment.
But there is nothing more natural or good about the Brooklyn I lived in -- which is gone, gone, gone -- than there is about the one that's there now. The new one is different, but of course it is. I am welcome to miss or mourn the Brooklyn I knew; the people who live there now are too busy living in this new one to care, and that is as it should be.
(Emphases added)

Well, maybe there is nothing more good--if that's a subjective judgment.

More natural? Well, cities are never natural. The redlining, highway subsidies, and low-interest loans that helped create the suburbs and empty out 1960s Brooklyn, the policies that earlier enforced the Bedford-Stuyvesant ghetto, or the combinations of clearance and subsidies that created MetroTech were hardly natural.

Still, I'd submit, the various instances of "corruption" hinted by Roth were not merely "business as usual." That is too simple, and too pat. And so, I'd submit, the Brooklyn he lived in--as did many of us--has been soured by the deceptions of various parties.

The arena is ever tainted by what I call the Culture of Cheating, not legally corruption but a sequence involving deceit, misdirection, and unfair privileges.

People may be "to busy... to care" about much. That's understandable. Still, in a culture when sports fans care very much about fairness on the court (or the ice), amnesia is selective.

Today, there's even more concrete evidence about cheating: the Barclays Center is named for a felonious (as of March 2015) bank. Yet the name "Barclays Center" is pronounced without qualm of skepticism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…