Skip to main content

On Brian Lehrer, Atlantic Yards gets muddled: de Blasio said to have used bully pulpit (nah), criticism of failed promises said to be absent (nah)

On 11/6/13 WNYC's Brian Lehrer Show offered  Transition Day One:
What now for Bill de Blasio? Ester Fuchs, professor of international and public affairs and political science at Columbia University and former adviser to Mayor Bloomberg, and Andrea Bernstein, metro editor at WNYC News, discuss what comes next for New York City's newest mayor.


At 36:46, "Peter in Park Slope called to say, "de Blasio's ardor for Bruce Ratner is no less slavish than Bloomberg's. So when I heard him keeping developers in check, demanding affordable housing, I had my head spinning."

"Because he supported Atlantic Yards," Lehrer offered.

"Yeah."

"Andrea," Lehrer followed up, "what do members of the permanent government have to fear from de Blasio different from... Mike Bloomberg. I'm talking about Wall Street, the real estate industry, and the public sector unions."

After noting that de Blasio's first meeting was with Bloomberg, after positioning himself as "the not-Bloomberg," Bernstein pointed out that de Blasio got many contributions at the end of his campaign--when his election seemed inevitable--from lobbyists and Wall Street.

Drilling down on AY

 "On Atlantic Yards," Bernstein continued, "Bill de Blasio's argument has been consistent that he got behind it because it was going to build affordable housing. He says as Public Advocate he used his bully pulpit to press for that. Now the rubber hits the road. What are the sanctions going to be against Bruce Ratner, who is a de Blasio friend, who funded his 50th birthday party, as a political fundraiser, if that housing doesn't get built?"

Actually, de Blasio has *not* used his bully pulpit, and it's disappointing that such a statement could be repeated without skepticism. WNYC's Matthew Schuerman has reported on this issue, so it's not an esoteric contention.

Given that Atlantic Yards is a state project, the city does not really have sanctions. What it does have is bonding capacity and subsidies, which it can devote to make the Atlantic Yards towers an easier or tougher deal for the developer. Consider that the city Housing Development Corporation pressured Ratner into adding more two-bedroom units to the first tower than initially announced but still let Ratner get away with far fewer family sized units than promised.

As mayor, de Blasio will have more carrots than sticks. I wouldn't be surprised if he "gets the housing done" by devoting more subsidies to the project.

The ACORN deal and CBA

Ester Fuchs said: "The issue to me around Ratner was not that [de Blasio] supported that, because Bertha Lewis supported that, she was at ACORN then. They did a really good deal on affordable housing. The problem is, he built the stadium first, and no one said, Hey build this affordable housing while you're building the stadium. That's the problem.

Lehrer said, "A good deal, except it turned out to be unenforceable."

Actually, there were two deals. The Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), which incorporates the Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding, is essentially unenforceable because no public party is a signatory. All the signatories--including ACORN and its successors--have some financial relationship with Forest City Ratner.

As a sign of their unwillingness to enforce that agreement, consider that none of them has publicly pressed that Forest City hire the Independent Compliance Monitor required by the Community Benefits Agreement. (Also, de Blasio, a big booster of the CBA, has been tellingly silent on that issue.)

The guiding document for Atlantic Yards is a Development Agreement Forest City Ratner signed with the Empire State Development Corporation.

That *is* enforceable. It just gives Ratner a long leash. Ratner's not in violation. Atlantic Yards critics and opponents, who *do* know Ratner's less than trustworthy record, did call him out for not building the housing.

The interesting question is why allies like Lewis and de Blasio kept quiet. Their uncritical support helped Ratner get hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks and subsidies. Ratner supported de Blasio's campaign. His company *bailed out* ACORN after the organization lost funding in the wake of an internal scandal (before the "pimp" sting).

de Blasio and Lewis may well believe the goals of Atlantic Yards are worth it. However, they've proceeded uncritically, while Ratner's record should have inspired skepticism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…