Skip to main content

The logical next step in EB-5: set up your own regional center, as in "Developers trade U.S. residency for China's cash"

Crain's reports Developers trade U.S. residency for China's cash, with the sub-heading "Silverstein Properties, The Related Cos. and others are among those setting up so-called regional centers to spin the promise of American residency into cash. Numbers of such operations are expected to double to 24 in just the next six months."

The headline itself is head-spinning, if you think about it. Why exactly should developers, or any other business, get cheap loans by offering green cards, which are public assets?

Only because of a loosely-written federal law that grants immigrant investors green cards for themselves and their families if they park $500,000 in a low-interest investment that creates--thanks to an economist's report--ten jobs.

However, if they're just substituting a low-interest loan for a typically higher-interest one, they're not creating jobs, they're creating more profits for the developer. Visas are public assets and, as I've written, it would make more sense for the U.S. government, as some other countries do, to simply require immigrant investors to park the money in government bonds, so at least the public is assured of some return.

The latest twist

The story begins:
Several major New York City developers are lining up to get permission from Washington to raise money through a government program that allows foreigners to become residents in the U.S. in exchange for investing in job-creating projects, including real estate development, here.
According to sources, Silverstein Properties and The Related Cos. are in the process of receiving approvals from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to open their own so-called regional centers rather than using New York City- or state-sponsored centers to market their real estate projects to wealthy foreign investors.
Known as the EB-5 foreign investor program, it has been successfully used in several real estate projects in the city in recent years, such as the Gem Tower that was built by Extell Development and a large mixed-used development in downtown Brooklyn called City Point. The program allows developers to source cheap debt from foreign markets, especially China, which has a growing class of wealthy citizens eager to gain residency in the U.S.
EB-5 fundraising has been around for years, but a move by developers to create their own capacity to originate debt through the program opens the potential for its expansion experts say. Previously, developers had used third-party sources, like the New York City Regional Center, to handle EB-5 transactions.
Note that the New York City Regional Center, which was used by Forest City Ratner (always ahead of the curve) for the "Brooklyn Arena and Infrastructure Project," is not sponsored by any government. Most regional centers are private businesses, approved by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) but middlemen taking their cut.

Cutting out the middlemen

From the article:
"Once you have your own regional center, it can be easier to raise EB-5 funds for more projects," Mr. [Steven Polivy, the head of law firm Akerman Senterfitt's New York City real estate practice] said. The typical method has been for developers to raise money through the financing vehicle one project at a time through organizations like the NYC Regional Center.
The move will also allow the developers to save on the fees they would have to pay to third party regional centers and also set down their own deal terms, such as how much interest they are willing to pay foreign investors.
The numbers

From the article:
"Developers are getting senior construction financing from traditional sources like banks and then using EB-5 to supplement that," Mr. Polivy said. "Normally a mezzanine loan in today's market is about 15% but you can get the same capital from EB-5 and pay a 5% return."
The money quote 

Nearly two years ago, I pointed to a quote from Andrew Kimball, then director of the Brooklyn Navy Yard:
The Brooklyn Navy Yard got New York's first batch of EB-5 money.
“At first, we were sort of scratching our heads, thinking, is this real?” said Mr. Kimball. “The next thing we knew, we were falling out of our chairs.”
Why? Maybe because it's hard to fathom a program that "creates" jobs without having to actually count them, but instead relies on an economist's report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.