Skip to main content

In IBO report on city's future office needs, a mention of Atlantic Yards capacity, but no assessment it's likely

A new report by the Independent Budget Office, at the request of Manhattan Council Member Daniel Garodnick, aims to assess whether the Bloomberg Administration’s plan for rezoning East Midtown "will foster an over-supply of office space in the coming decades."

The answer in Is the City Making Way for More Office Space Than Needed Over the Next 30 Years?is no, more or less,, though the IBO acknowledges considerable uncertainty. Here's coverage in the Daily News, Capital New York, and Crain's.

Then again, even recent history shows that office space projections can be way off. Sen. Chuck Schumer's Group of 35 report in 2001 predicted a huge need for office space in Downtown Brooklyn, which didn't come to fruition. As the Wall Street Journal reported:
Indeed, few researchers could have predicted the recent changes in the city's office market. Since Hudson Yards was rezoned and construction began on the World Trade Center project, a recession sapped demand from the financial-services companies that typically dwell in new skyscrapers. Meanwhile, small technology companies have turned up their noses at traditional towers and created a boom for old industrial buildings.
And if you read between the lines, though the IBO in three places mentions Atlantic Yards, where there's a stalled plan for an office tower, the agency does not assume it will be built.

An AY mention

The first mention of AY comes near the top:
Because of such concerns, at the request of Council Member Daniel Garodnick, IBO has updated its 2004 projections of office needs in the city. In this new report IBO projects growth in office-using employment over 30 years to 2040 and compares it with an updated estimate of new commercial space already being developed as well as what may be developed in the coming years at Hudson Yards, the World Trade Center, Downtown Brooklyn, Atlantic Yards, and other locations in the city.
The IBO acknowledges uncertainty, given "variations in factors such as job-growth estimates and the amount of space that firms lease per worker, along with the extent to which older office buildings are converted to residential use." Also, no longer does the financial sector provoke growth in office employment, but rather businesses with "different needs and work styles: media, technology, and design."

Three scenarios

The IBO developed three scenarios. Based on the midrange scenario, it forecasts a need for about 52 million square feet of office space through 2040, which could  support the full buildout of Hudson Yards, the World Trade Center, and other sites throughout the city, including East Midtown.

However, office space could be as low as 30 million square feet or as much as the 87 million square feet estimated, more or less, cited by the Bloomberg Administration.

Given the uncertainty surrounding estimates of the need for office-using space, the report also considers the risks tied to funding pedestrian, subway, and other improvements in East Midtown with revenue generated by the sale of additional development rights.

Space per worker
The IBO notes that office designers historically estimate that workers require 250 square feet of space per person, but that amount has steadily fallen recently, "for a variety of reasons, including the decreasing need for file storage and server space, the increasing popularity of open floor plans, a renewed focus on controlling costs."

Note that Forest City Ratner used 200 sf/worker for Atlantic Yards at a time when government agencies used 250/sf. Should an Atlantic Yards office tower ever be built, it might hold more workers than previously estimated.
Then again, as Bruce Ratner told Crain's in November 2009: “Can you tell me when we are going to need a new office tower?”

Factors affecting long-term demand

The IBO also cites conversion or demolition of existing office buildings and changes in how office space is used:
For the purposes of this analysis, IBO has assumed that by 2040, owners of office properties in Manhattan’s central business districts and in Downtown Brooklyn, neighborhoods that feature both strong residential demand and a preponderance of the city’s oldest office buildings, will convert or demolish 10 percent of those neighborhoods’ prewar office space and 5 percent of its space built from 1946 through 1961. This amounts to a total of 19.9 million square feet in conversions and demolitions, or an average of 738,000 square feet per year. If employment growth remains steady, the market would need to replace the space that is lost.
As for buildings currently under construction, most is in Manhattan, in 1 and 4 World Trade Center, then Hudson Yards. Smaller projects include 1000 Dean Street in Crown Heights./


Future development sites

In its list of future development sites, relying on the 2012 Hudson Yards bond offering and more recent information, the IBO cites "the conversion of the Domino Sugar Factory in Williamsburg, Brooklyn... and the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Watchtower properties in DUMBO." (Note that most of the Domino property is not being converted; it's being demolished for new construction.)

AY: part of capacity, is it likely?

The report also cites additional capacity in Brooklyn and Queens:
The rezonings of Downtown Brooklyn, Atlantic Yards, Long Island City, and Jamaica collectively included the potential for nearly 12 million square feet of office space. These rezoning initiatives reflect the efforts of multiple mayoral administrations to expand the city’s central business district into the other boroughs.In the years since the plans were approved, residential properties have accounted for nearly all new development in those areas, though there remains additional capacity should a market develop for modern office space in the other boroughs. Since 2006, developers have built three new build-to-suit office buildings totaling 1.4 million square feet in Long Island City, though no new projects are proceeding there at the moment.
Since a detailed site-by-site review of these areas was beyond the scope of this paper, IBO instead assumed that one-quarter of the nearly 12 million square feet of development rights created in the rezonings are still unused, which would translate into as much as 2.9 million square feet of office space that could be built in Brooklyn and Queens.
Actually, Atlantic Yards was not rezoned; it was a state override of zoning. And while " a detailed site-by-site review" is understandably difficult, it's well-known that Forest City Ratner and parent Forest City Enterprises have said nothing about an office tower recently.

Indeed, the IBO acknowledges:
Not all of these sites will ultimately be developed as office buildings. The fact that a site is zoned for office development does not guarantee that its owner will ultimately build new office space, particularly if there is little demand in that location or if there is a "higher and better use" for the land. As noted, the owners of several sites in Downtown Brooklyn and Midtown West have opted to build residential or hotel projects instead of office buildings in locations where the zoning rules allowed either use.
While it may at some point become financially wise to build on the Atlantic Yards plaza, I suspect that Forest City and some backers will make the argument that the "high-low city" is worth keeping. (Would they ask for something in return, like a transfer of development rights?)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.