Skip to main content

Down the rabbit hole: report suggests city grant for Atlantic Yards went to ESDC at Forest City's office address

A recent report from advocates critical of New York State's economic development policies leads down the rabbit hole to Atlantic Yards, where city documents are dismayingly opaque.

Those documents inadequately reference the extent of state subsidies for the project, and somehow place the Empire State Development Corporation at an address for Forest City Ratner.

What does this mean? At the least, such sloppy reporting makes oversight more difficult.

A critical report

A 5/29/13 article from the Syracuse Post-Standard, New York's economic development 'gamble' costs $7 billion a year, report says, laid out the charges:
New York spends $7 billion annually on dozens of economic development programs, but it has no way of knowing whether it's getting its money's worth, according to a report [The $7,000,000 Wager, bottom] by a coalition of public policy experts, government watchdogs, labor unions and community organizations.
The Alliance for a Greater New York [ALIGN] said few of the state's programs require recipients of subsidies to set performance goals such as job creation. It said few require project-specific reporting or monitor the success of projects and that few allow for adequate public review or recourse when corporations fail to live up to their agreements.
"Our findings show that New York's current spending on economic development is more of a gamble than an investment," the group said Wednesday.
"This opaque and unaccountable system makes it impossible for the public or policymakers to determine if our $7 billion investment is working for New York," said the group, which is based in New York City but has affiliates across the state.
The alliance called on the state to adopt performance standards to evaluate the success of spending in relation to key goals, including job creation.
It also recommended that the state require companies to give back the subsidies they receive if they fail to meet their promised job creation goals.
The spending estimate is based on annual reports and audits of various state economic development programs and agencies, but, as I discovered, those reports are not so easy to understand.

The state responds

A 5/30/13 follow-up by the Gannett chain cited the report in the context of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's controversial proposal for tax-free zones for businesses that on state college campuses.

The state responded:
The largest program for state incentives is through the Empire State Development Corp., the state’s economic development arm. It doled out more than $1 billion in tax breaks and grants in 2011, the report said.
...Ken Adams, president and CEO of Empire State Development, said there is a “disconnect between this report –- the findings of which are based on some outdated and inaccurate data -- and today’s reality.”
“The report advocates for transparency and accountability–laudable goals and also hallmarks of this administration,” Adams said in a statement. “At Empire State Development, the state’s lead economic development agency, those standards are already in place: from open-to-the-public board meetings to mandated project reporting to pay-for-performance incentives and claw-back provisions."
From the report: an Atlantic Yards mention

The ESDC was the number one recipient in 2012 of a grant from the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC), as suggested in the screenshot below, from p. 23 of the report (bottom):


This is rather confusing, because 1) that's not the address of the ESDC and 2) no such grant was announced in 2012, to my knowledge.

Down the rabbit hole

I went to the NYCEDC's web site to see if I could find supporting documents.
In its Public Authorities Reporting Information System (PARIS) report for FY 2011, there's no mention of any grant to the Empire State Development.

In the FY 2012 PARIS report, there is a $20,444,233 grant to the Empire State Development Corporation.

It's dated 9/12/07.

This is apparently part of the city's $179 million in subsidies for both land acquisition and infrastructure costs related to Atlantic Yards.

However, it's unclear why 1) there's no mention of the grant, in whole or in part, in the earlier report, given that the date is 2007, and 2) the grant is not reported in full.

Perhaps only this portion of the subsidy was delivered in 2012.

Moreover, it's absolutely bizarre that the address for the ESDC is reported at 752 Pacific Street. That building was long owned by Henry Weinstein, who lost the property in 2010 to ESDC via eminent domain after a convoluted battle with his tenant.

But ESDC never operated an office there. Forest City Ratner has offices there, including its Community Liaison Office, as indicated in the screenshot at right.

And, of course, Forest City was ultimately the recipient or beneficiary of the government funds. (I queried NYCEDC and ESDC but didn't get a response.)

More NYCEDC confusion

The NYCEDC PARIS reports are not easy to understand. Below are just a few random examples.

In the report for FY 2011, which ended 6/30/11, there's an $11.7 million grant dated 4/30/04 to the American Museum of the Moving Image. In the FY 2012 report, there's a $4 million grant dated 4/30/04 to the American Museum of the Moving Image.

There's no indication why the grants differ, unless different amounts were delivered in successive years.

Secondarily, in the FY 2011 report, there's a $3.95 million grant issued 7/19/10 to the Apollo Theater Foundation. In the FY 2012 report, however, there's no mention of that grant, but there is mention of an earlier 6/15/10 grant worth nearly $410,000. It seems odd that the earlier grant would be delivered later.

2011 report





2012 report







ff

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.