Skip to main content

A first look at the booming market for scalpers outside the Barclays Center; arena staffer says it's "impossible to regulate" counterfeit tickets (really?)

The Fort Greene/Clinton Hill Local deserves credit for being the first, to my knowledge, to cover this phenomenon: Ticket Scalpers Shadow Barclays Center Events. After all, those of us wandering around the perimeter of the arena frequently get asked if we want to buy tickets, or have any extras to sell.

But I don't buy this passage:
Thanks to these online ticket vendors, [scalper] Lamar said he has been lucky just to get face value for most tickets, unless it’s a major game against the Miami Heat or New York Knicks. However, Justin Bieber and Jay-Z concert tickets can sell for an additional 10 to 20 percent on top of the original ticket price, he said.
Actually, online sites like StubHub are already selling tickets for many events well over face value.

Also, I don't think that, as described in the article, the resale market is the same as scalping. 

But let's hope others take a deeper look, especially since the police have recorded exactly two arrests.

A counterfeit tale

A reader, Scott Salmon, sent the following report:
I purchased the [Nets game] ticket on the corner of 5th Ave. and Flatbush from a scalper. The ticket appeared to be a real ticketmaster ticket (and was not one of those PDF computer print-outs). I was aware of the potential of a counterfeit ticket and asked the vendor to assure me it was real and he went into a 5 minute tirade about how he would never sell fake tickets and assured me it was legitimate.
I went up to the gate and the ticket would not scan. They referred me to the customer service line. After waiting about 5 minutes, I spoke to a rep at the window. He took the ticket and they tried to scan it on one of their scanners and it again failed. The rep showed it to his supervisor who seemed to be able to confirm visually that the ticket was a fake. The supervisor did not come to the window to address me personally. I was told by the rep that they had to confiscate the ticket but they offered to give me a photocopy of the ticket which I declined.
They then offered me an available ticket for that night's game for the price of $80. I declined. I asked them if they were making any effort to curb the practice of counterfeit tickets and the rep said it was "impossible to regulate". I did not follow-up with any police officers and I was unable to locate the guy who sold me the ticket.
It may not be easy to regulate, but it's not "impossible to regulate." I suspect that some undercover buyers would cut down on this.

According to, New York has numerous laws that regulate re-selling, including license requirements, a prohibition on resale within 1500 feet of a venue seating more than 5,000 people, and a guarantee of refunds if the ticket does not conform to its advertised description.


  1. MANY tickets are on resale sites like Stubhub are BELOW face value, less than what you'd pay directly to Ticketmaster.

    1. Upper deck seats on StubHub for tmrw night start at $34-38--well above face, right?

    2. Tomorrow night's game looks to be an outlier - most games start at $10 or $15. It varies wildly by opponent, though, as you'd expect.

      Meanwhile, a friend who lives near the arena who's been scoping out the scalper market reports that the best place to find scalped tickets looks to be "inside the subway station, at the base of the escalators, right in front of the cops."

  2. Anonymous10:07 AM

    Plenty of tickets on stubhub are listed at well over face value. That doesn't mean those tickets will ultimately sell at the asking price. There is a bit of adverse selection involved - tickets listed for less than face are more likely to get sold and are removed from the site at a quicker pace. Tickets selling for greater than face are less likely to get sold and then remain listed on the site for a longer time. In reality, there is no where to compare the ratio of tickets actually sold for less than face to tickets actially sold for more than face without access to stubhubs data. If you want to do a much deserved write up on ticket scalping or resale sites, look into the hurricane sandy benefit at MSG.

  3. One buys a ticket on the street at one's own (very high) risk. With the advent of StubHub and other online marketplaces, someone who sells his or her ticket electronically will still be in possession of the paper ticket -- which is an actual, real ticket, except it then sports a barcode that has been electronically voided. The only way one should even consider buying a ticket on the street is if the seller is willing to accompany the purchaser to the turnstile.

  4. Anonymous4:44 PM

    As a person who has scalped and been scalped...I feel your pain....although the characterization by the barclays staff that its impossible to regulate is an overstatement. The police and arena staff have protocols to stop and curb scalping surrounding the arena. You should have been advised to file a police report and the arena staff should have directed you to do so. I was taken for about $300.00 some time ago by a sophisticated scalping scam where tickets were almost indistinguishable from real ones. It took a specially trained eye to determine its illegitimacy. Although. I was out my money I did get satisfaction in knowing that my police report led to arrests and criminal fines for a third party printer who contracted with ticketmaster and illegally copied ticket templates. These operations are more sophisticated then ever and include elements of organized crime. In the future use stubhub or buy from sellers who are willing to walk to the gate with you. It may be still possible for you to file a police report and if so I would encourage you to do so. Good Luck


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…