Skip to main content

Daily News claims Goldstein "disses neighbors" by pursuing as-of-right renovation/addition

Also see follow-ups from Gothamist (which quotes neighbor Kathryn Roake as telling Daniel Goldstein's architects "I hope their house burns down") and The New York Observer.

The Daily News article today hyped as an "exclusive," Daniel Goldstein fought the Atlantic Yards project, but disses neighbors with his own construction, reminds me of the tabloid reporter described in The Submission, Amy Waldman's new 9/11 novel:
A tabby all the way--that's what she was. She had no ideology, believed only in information, which she obtained, traded, peddled, packaged, and published, and she opposed any effort to doctor her product.
So Goldstein, a co-founder of Develop Don't Dstroy Brooklyn, bought a new house in Park Slope and planned a renovation and addition. His neighbors don't like it, according to the Daily News:
Next-door neighbor Kathryn Roake, 59, says Goldstein's 18-foot, three-story addition to the back of his building will block the light to her beloved fruit and vegetable garden.
She and another neighbor also think that construction will damage their houses.

What's missing

Here's what's missing from the article: whether Goldstein's plans violate zoning in some way, or whether he's requested a variance from the Department of Buildings.

No, and no.

Nor was any evidence offered showing that the addition would, in fact, block the sun, despite the Daily News's conclusory caption:

So the Daily News elevated a garden-variety dispute into a tabloid story.

The AY connection

Particularly laughable is the connection to Atlantic Yards. The story begins:
The Brooklyn activist who led the resistance to the Atlantic Yards project has angered his new neighbors with a construction project of his own.
Atlantic Yards is just a few orders of magnitude larger than Goldstein's 3-story extension. It required a state override of zoning, eminent domain, and significant subsidies and tax breaks.

And a study of the environmental impacts indicated that it would, in fact, block the sun in certain locations.

But the headline and caption embrace the strained parallel:

Meanwhile, the Daily News has missed several issues of accountability regarding the Atlantic Yards story.

The same reporter who wrote the Goldstein story attended the meeting community leaders had with Empire State Development CEO Kenneth Adams on September 26 but either didn't write--or wasn't permitted to write--a story.

Goldstein's response

The Daily News said Goldstein did not respond to requests for comment.

I contacted him and he gave me this statement:
Soon after we bought our home we reached out to our neighbors to meet them. They did not respond positively as you can see in the Daily News article. We haven't filed plans yet, but once we do we will be building well within zoning and within the law and we'll be certain to protect our neighbors' property and our own.
Why didn't he respond to the Daily News?
I didn't want to have a discussion with my neighbor in the press. But now that it's been in the paper, I'm responding to your query.
But didn't the article leave the impression that Goldstein had ignored contact from the neighbors?
As I wrote, we reached out to both neighbors and you can read their response to our initial communication in the DN article.
In other words, the Daily News didn't mention that Goldstein tried to contact them first. Then the neighbors threatened to sue.

Comments

  1. Murdoch and RATner. Two pigs in a pod.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, the Daily News is owned by (real estate magnate) Mort Zuckerman. Murdoch owns the NY Post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting story - however I don't really understand the purpose of the first Amy Waldman quote; a good reporter is supposed to be interested in information, not ideology.

    Isn't that how a decent journalist is supposed to be?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, a good reporter should evaluate information, not merely dole it out as a news item in itself. Not every piece of information is worth a news story.

    I interpret ideology in this context as including a willingness to evaluate the information in context. And ideology could include such things as democratic discourse, not partisan politics.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The reason many people were sympathetic to DDDB was because it (purportedly) shielded long-time residents from an outsider's attempt to alter the light, sound, and feel of the neighborhood. It was the mother of all NIMBY efforts. In the end DDDB lost every major lawsuit, so the AY project was also 'legal'. The fact that Goldstein didn't request a variance is dodging the issue: he is doing to his neighbors exactly what Ratner is doing: proceeding with his dream of building on a site regardless of what the neighbors think by positing he's within his rights. Hypocrite doesn't even come close to describing this...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Um, there's a difference between legal (as in state override) and as-of-right.

    ReplyDelete
  7. DDDB wasn't going to the mat to prevent any use of eminent domain, it was trying to prevent eminent domain from being exercised at that particular location. If the AY proposal had been as-of-right DDDB would still have tried to block it because of it's impact on the neighborhood.

    Look at your own reporting on how parking and traffic are being affected - if AY had been as-of-right you would still have the same concerns. Same with all the environmental impact reports. The big issue for AY is the impact on the community; the big issue for the 15th street neighbors is the impact the addition would have on them. Same thing.

    Don't get me wrong; I think he has every right to build his addition and people in NYC constantly have to deal with these kinds of issues. The complaining owner could have bought where there was no risk posed by zoning allowances. I just think FCR had the same right (since the Supreme Court had just settled the matter with the Connecticut case) and Goldstein is justifying himself with a very FCR-like defense. To me, the irony is rich.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The issue goes well beyond eminent domain (and if you think the state court's decision was solid, well, ask Ronald Chen).
    http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2011/04/ay-eminent-domain-decision-among-worst.html

    AY could not have been as-of-right because city zoning bars sports facilities from within 200 feet of residences.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.