Skip to main content

Another push to turn luxury condos into affordable housing, but cost is unclear; report proposes eminent domain for condos but slams it for AY

Can 4000 empty luxury condos, including some in and around Downtown Brooklyn, really be converted into low-income housing owned by a community land trust or the New York City Housing Authority?

Several activist groups say yes, though their proposals--involving tax foreclosure and the use of eminent domain--are thin on the actual number of condos that might qualify, given that only a fraction are in empty buildings rather than simply languishing on the market.

Also not estimated is the cost of such housing programs, which would be significant, and the comparison of this tactic with others aimed at achieving subsidized housing. The cost likely would be much greater than the Housing Asset Renewal Program, proposed by Council Speaker Christine Quinn, and Project Reclaim, proposed by Brooklyn Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, which have similar goals but do not require permanent affordability nor limit the buildings to low-income residents.

Still, a report issued yesterday makes some policy recommendations that deserve discussion: development tax breaks should be suspended, and owners of buildings who warehouse their units for more than a year should be assessed fees.

Among the e
lected officials supporting the report are Brooklyn City Council Members Letitia James and Brad Lander.

What about AY?

The report criticizes New York State for using eminent domain "to pave the way for large-scale, luxury development projects," such as Atlantic Yards, the "vast majority of which will be luxury, market-rate housing despite the proliferation of failed luxury housing that already currently exists in this area."

(The report says AY will help" further the gentrification of low-income communities." By contrast, ACORN, Forest City Ratner's partner, contends the project will help fight gentrification. The Empire State Development Corporation says gentrification was already happening in the areas nearby.)

Also, given the large number of market-rate units yet unsold, the report implicitly casts doubt on projections by Empire State Development Corporation consultant KPMG that condo prices in AY towers would reach $1217/sf in 2015.

The overview

From a press release issued yesterday:
Six primarily low-income neighborhoods across the city are home to 4,092 empty housing units, on the market for an average of nearly $2 million, as New York City continues to face record homelessness and increasingly unavailable low-income housing, according to new data released today by Right to the City-NYC (RTTC-NYC). The report, "People Without Homes and Homes Without People: A Count of Vacant Condos In Select NYC Neighborhoods," follows RTTC-NYC’s fall count of vacant condos in these six neighborhoods.

The luxury units, in both completely and partially vacant buildings, include 138 condo buildings that collectively owe $3.8 million to the city in back taxes for being more than one year delinquent on property, water, or sewer taxes. RTTC-NYC— a coalition of community organizations—joined with elected officials today to call on the City to acquire the tax delinquent buildings through tax foreclosure and convert vacant units into permanently affordable housing for low-income New Yorkers.

“Luxury buildings are sitting empty in the middle of neighborhoods impacted by the recession and high rates of homelessness. These same buildings are costing the city millions in missing tax revenue. This is no brainer— New York City shouldn’t stand for vacant housing when so many people in those same communities are in need of a place to live,” said David Dodge, the Right to the City Coordinator and one of the primary researchers on the project.
To which Real Estate Board of New York president Steven Spinola told Metro, “If an owner wants to charge a certain amount and believes he can get it, he has a right to hold onto it."

Looking more closely

Well, yes, but. If buildings are in tax arrears, the owner's rights diminish.

And, as Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer has suggested, based on a plan from Boston, taxes could be increased on warehoused land and buildings.

Some of the examples, as shown at left (click to enlarge), do not necessarily make the case for turning condos into low-income housing. Yes, the Forte condo faced foreclosure; that led to lower prices. The owners of the Oro were forced to lower their prices as well, and might have had to do so faster were a law in place regarding warehoused apartments. (KPMG lied about sales at the Oro, as well.)

Crain's New York headlined its coverage 4,000 new luxury condos sitting vacant. The New York Daily News headlined its coverage Taxes take hit in luxury condo bust: study.

Solution: public housing?

More from the press release:
In addition to the proposal for buildings in tax arrears, RTTC-NYC’s report includes other recommendations for creating affordable housing from empty condo units including: converting units into public housing or community land trusts and seizing vacant condos by eminent domain.

RTTC-NYC is additionally recommending suspending development tax breaks to developers and imposing fees on owners of buildings who warehouse their units for more than a year. The Coalition is encouraging the City Council to pass legislation— Housing Not Warehousing (Intro 48)—to require an annual, citywide count of vacant properties in New York City. The legislation, introduced by Council Member Melissa Mark Viverito, currently has 28 co-sponsors.
Downtown Brooklyn

RTTC-NYC identified empty units and buildings in tax arrears in six neighborhoods, including Downtown Brooklyn, defined generously as extending to Bedford-Stuyvesant, including Community District 2 and part of Community District 3.

In Downtown Brooklyn, canvassers identified 829 empty units. Most of them, 711 units, were in 36 partially vacant buildings where, presumably, price cuts could lead to buyers.

However, there are 15 completely vacant buildings with 118 vacant units.

There are also 26 buildings in tax arrears, with more than $1 million outstanding. Is that enough to lead to foreclosure? Unclear.

Looking for the list

I asked for a list of buildings and was told it wouldn't be released. RTTC did provide two additional Downtown Brooklyn buildings, among those with the largest tax arrears:
  • 525 Clinton Ave in Clinton Hill (owes $324,689)
  • 80 DeKalb in Fort Greene (owes $240,980)
Forest City Ratner's 80 DeKalb, according to a Brownstoner tipster, is supposed to be 50% rented. If it's in tax arrears, I'd bet it's less that the building is vulnerable to foreclosure than Forest City Ratner maintaining cash flow.

Or maybe it's more complicated. FCR also missed a mortgage payment at 10 MetroTech, which is the main component of the block-wide complex that includes 80 DeKalb.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…