Skip to main content

Where were you? Brooklyn AIA offers belated, underinformed AY solutions

Some of the most sober and trenchant criticism of Atlantic Yards has come from architects, notably Jonathan Cohn in his now on-hiatus Brooklyn Views blog. Now, four years after the project was announced, a letter to the editor published in this week's Brooklyn Paper is the first evidence, as far as I can tell, that the Brooklyn chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIA)--or any other AIA chapter--has taken a stance on Atlantic Yards.

Despite attempts to be constructive, the message is underinformed and in some ways misguided.

Can arena be moved?

Under the unfortunately optimistic headline Expert: There is a way to fix Atlantic Yards traffic, I. Donald Weston, chair of the Urban Design Committee of the Brooklyn Chapter of the AIA, first criticizes those questioning arena security issues.

He writes: Your article, “City can’t curb Yards security” (Dec. 8) indicates a lack of understanding by the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods that buildings can be designed today to be far more blast resistant than they used to be, that measures can be taken to keep vehicles from getting too close to a building and, if required by the NYPD, that the stadium can be relocated further away from the street prior to construction.

Yes, buildings can be designed to be blast resistant, but that didn't stop police in Newark from closing streets bordering the new Prudential Center. So the questions are legitimate.

Also, the arena--not a stadium--quite possibly couldn't be relocated further from the street, given the lack of slack in the design. (Note that the outer ring in the rendering represents the arena roof. Click to enlarge.)

Traffic solutions?

Weston continues:
But what still concerns the Brooklyn Chapter of the American Institute of Architects is the adverse impact the stadium will have on the traffic in the area. In hopes of mitigating the additional traffic anticipated when the stadium is in use, the Chapter suggests the following measures:

1. The city should prohibit the Nets arena from providing any off-street parking at the arena site. Instead, the city should provide municipal parking for approximately 1,000 cars at one or several locations in an industrial area in the Brownsville/East New York area, within walking distance of public transportation. This parking would be used on a daily basis for business people driving to work as well as for patrons attending basketball games.

However, on game nights, either the Nets or the Atlantic Yards developer should be required to provide shuttle buses from the remote parking areas to the arena.


While this may be a good idea even without Atlantic Yards, given potential congestion pricing, an offsite parking lot in Brownsville/East New York would mainly accommodate those coming from the east. It's hard to imagine arena-goers from Staten Island or Yonkers driving that far.

The Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) has already determined that there should be more than 1000 spaces for onsite parking, including, in the beginning, at interim surface lots. Had the Brooklyn chapter of the AIA truly felt strongly about this advice, it should have offered it in last year before the ESDC public comment period ended. The state overrides zoning, and the city can't prohibit parking on its own.

There already is a shuttle bus plan involving remote parking to the west, at MetroTech and Long Island College Hospital, as well as park-and-ride lots in Staten Island.

Eliminate parking?

The letter continues:
2. Eliminate parking on all major thoroughfares going to, or coming from, Manhattan during rush hours, and meter all side streets in the area. Enforce existing “Don’t Block the Box” rules at all major intersections.


Any solution inevitably frustrates some constituency; in this case, it's hardly clear that metering side streets would be a better solution than, say, neighborhood parking permits.

More advice

The letter continues:
3. Eliminate parking permits for city employees’ private vehicles to encourage them to take public transportation.

4. Discount bus and subway fares during off hours.


Not bad ideas, but not exactly AY solutions.

Reduced density?

The letter continues:
Of course, the best solution would be to reduce the density of the residential/commercial area in Atlantic Yards. If most of the existing streets would remain as city property, whether open for vehicular traffic or relegated to pedestrian use only, and the same floor area ratio is retained, the total buildable floor area would be reduced by approximately 20 percent, which would substantially reduce traffic.

Atlantic Yards critics have long condemned the superblock plan, but developer Forest City Ratner does not intend to move the Miss Brooklyn skyscraper to leave Fifth Avenue open. And were Pacific Street between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues retained, well, the project would lose a good chunk of the planned open space.

Had the Brooklyn chapter of AIA submitted these proposals to the ESDC last year, it would've been told why the state didn't think they could work.

Welcome development?


The letter concludes:
The Chapter is very much in favor of bringing a professional basketball team to Brooklyn and developing the rail yard area, but we do not feel that enough thought has been given to the traffic impact of the overall development.

We believe that if our suggestions are adopted it will prevent a traffic disaster from occurring.


The problem is that similar suggestions have already been rejected. In other words, it should be hard to offer those suggestions at this point with a straight face.

Paging Jane Jacobs

On Wednesday, I pointed to a critic of Jane Jacobs, who noted that the urbanist focused her critique on planners, a "relatively powerless group," rather than the developers and government officials with real clout.

Perhaps, but professionals like planners and architects can have some clout, especially when they lead, rather than follow, the public discourse. The New York Metro Chapter of the American Planning Association, to its credit, delivered some sober criticism of the Atlantic Yards plan before the ESDC deadline.

The group stated that AY "raises serious questions of good planning and design, public process, appropriate scale and density, respect for surrounding neighborhood character, and adequate transportation and infrastructure -- all of which deserve careful study and modification."

While constructive criticism may be useful now, or later, organizations of architects, however, sat out the debate when it was most crucial.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…