Skip to main content

On historic preservation, AY, and journalistic quality

The New York Times has assigned a notably diligent reporter, Sewell Chan, to write for the Empire Zone blog and, unfettered by space, he’s free to write long, like, um, a Mad Overkiller.

He and I both attended a panel Monday on the preservation movement, and I’ll mostly defer to his lengthy report, The Future of New York’s Past. (Chan even mentioned some of the attendees, including "Norman Oder, the Atlantic Yards critic." The Empire Zone thus threatens to become the Gawker of wonk celebrity sightings.)

Chan quotes Anthony Wood, founder and chairman of the New York Preservation Archive Project, regarding the Landmarks Preservation Law:
“Our law is not a timid document,” Mr. Wood said. “However, since its passage. The implementation of the law has been characterized by timidity, and by and large, the preservation community has come to expect low expectations from the law. It has underachieved, and we have let it.”

All about rebirth

Historic preservation consultant William Higgins offered an entertaining tour of the dichotomous ways advocates and opponents face off. While opponents, for example, may disparage a building as evoking a “shopping mall,” advocates often ignore image and emphasize “vitality” and “rebirth.”

Does that sounds a little like Atlantic Yards, ”the development dedicated to building a new vision for downtown Brooklyn”?

Buildings vs. intangibles

Higgins also observed—absent from Chan’s generally thorough report—how “inside every activist there’s a contemplative person.” It’s also important to “think about the pleasure of the historical environment,” he said, recalling an hour he spent in the courtyard of Trinity Church.

His point was that activists spend much effort trying to save specific structures but should also spend more time “working on a language for these intangibles for historic preservation.”

In the battle over the Atlantic Yards project, there are relatively few buildings of historic merit that preservationists aim to save. (But there certainly are some, and their preservation would preclude a planned superblock.)

However, that issue of intangibles–a sense of place–was brought up by Shirley Morillo, who wrote about Atlantic Yards for her Columbia master’s thesis in historic preservation:
Other area resources include less fixed, and more difficult to quantify factors such as scale, the skyline, view corridors, and sense of place. Inherently a challenge to measure, claims for these characteristics are made more difficult because the scope of the project’s true area of impact is so difficult to limit.

Tradeoffs

Is such an argument too precious? One commenter on the blog offered an interesting challenge:
The other side of this debate relates to the ‘character’ of a neighborhood, the ways in which its structures and their uses relate to each other. Here, advocates wish to preserve not the physical forms of the city, but their emotional ‘feel.’ At its best, this is the impulse to restrain the construction of a massive, modern tower on an unoccupied plot of land in the middle of a row of historic townhouses. At its worst, this is the impulse of those living in a particular neighborhood to freeze its natural development and evolution at an arbitrarily chosen moment, and perhaps inflate the value of their own properties in the process.

The commenter added:
There is a lot of sanctimony and piety, but little discussion of the tradeoffs inherent in any process of preservation, little sense that the genuine benefits have to be weighed against the substantial costs.

Well, then. What's the best way to integrate new, and more dense, development, around the edges of historic Prospect Heights? There would be towers, not in the "middle of a row of historic townhouses," but very nearby. The issue is as much process as esthetics.

On journalistic quality

I made my point about intangibles in a comment on the Empire Zone, where the comments section detoured into an off-topic discussion--which I did not invite--of my journalistic bona fides.

I hadn't made an issue of Chan's description of me, but another commenter defended me, saying that I was not a critic of the Atlantic Yards project but mainly of the press coverage. I clarified that to say that the Times’s description was not incorrect but incomplete, since I consider myself reporter and critic.

Times deputy metro editor Patrick LaForge chimed in, responding, “Identifying you as a reporter might cause readers of The Times to think that we agreed with your (apparent) assessment of yourself as a neutral observer.”

In my response, I acknowledged (via this link) that I’m not neutral, but argued that “my reportage is just that and, I’d argue, more comprehensive and intellectually honest than that which appears in the Times regarding Atlantic Yards.”

LaForge offered a partial olive branch: “So to call you a critic, while highlighting your role for our readers, does not preclude the idea that you are also engaged in a type of reportage, one with a long and storied tradition.”

OK, I'm not actually a reporter, but I am engaged in a "type of reportage"--like coverage of the federal lawsuit and state lawsuit regarding Atlantic Yards that almost no one else bothered to do. (Please, though, let's leave that Empire Zone discussion alone.)

Proving my point

Yesterday, my case was bolstered when the underinformed Post and the Times misreported aspects of a court case related to Atlantic Yards, and New York Magazine's blog, finding snark more seductive than substance, got it spectacularly wrong.

NoLandGrab (and again) and Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn have the details on this brutally weird episode.

(Here's my straightforward report. Reportage, or reporter?)

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.